All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

UKOPS - the Leaderboard.

2

Comments

  • aussie09aussie09 Member Posts: 8,033
    edited October 2011

    square root of the prize money in each event added together would work

    · Share on Twitter
  • wynne1938wynne1938 Member Posts: 20,571
    edited October 2011
    What about a points system.
    All players on the final table get points for each finishing place

    1    10
    2     8
    3     6
    4    4
    5    2 
    6    1
    Just an example, could not be any fairer!
    · Share on Twitter
  • pocket9spocket9s Member Posts: 99
    edited October 2011
    1st = 1 point
    2nd  = 2 points
    max 100 pts... over 100 counts as non runner!

    etc etc

    lowest ave score wins.. maybe min 3 events to find average???
    · Share on Twitter
  • bigflop1bigflop1 Member Posts: 1,034
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    1st = 1 point 2nd  = 2 points max 100 pts... over 100 counts as non runner! etc etc lowest ave score wins.. maybe min 3 events to find average???
    Posted by pocket9

    +1  i wont be playing 3 events but sounds like a fair league!!

    even those who play 3 would have to have 3 top 100 finishes??
    · Share on Twitter
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2011
    =(((((B2-A2)/A2)*1000)*(C2/100))^0.33)*10+(B2/C2)

    Where B Winnings, A Buyin and C players. Gives a good spread of values, and rewards ROI, while taking into account buyin size and player field as well as winnings.


    I think it gives some pretty good results
    · Share on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09 Member Posts: 8,033
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    =(((((B2-A2)/A2)*1000)*(C2/100))^0.33)*10+(B2/C2) Where B Winnings, A Buyin and C players. Gives a good spread of values, and rewards ROI, while taking into account buyin size and player field as well as winnings. I think it gives some pretty good results
    Posted by CoxyLboro
    lol


    · Share on Twitter
  • Nutter5932Nutter5932 Member Posts: 349
    edited October 2011
    Whatever Coxys says.....clearly thought about ha

    I don't think it should be averaged out though personally it should be a total points over every event. This is how the big big leagues do it i think ? and also it encourages people to play more events thus increasing skys rake gain also + a few more players towards the prize fund !


    · Share on Twitter
  • AAelmoAAAAelmoAA Member Posts: 51
    edited October 2011
    Would it be wrong to do some thing along the lines of the WSOP POY formula?
    · Share on Twitter
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 173,875
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    Would it be wrong to do some thing along the lines of the WSOP POY formula?
    Posted by AAelmoAA
    Deffo worth a gander, Mr AA.

    By the way, congrats on being the FIRST player to qualify for the £530 UKOPS High Roller! Now get the job finished, eh?
    · Share on Twitter
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited October 2011
    small suggestion

    may not ebe liked


    20 points of all players who participate.

    40 points for cashing

    60 points for top 10 finnish

    80 increaseing to 200 points on Final table.
    · Share on Twitter
  • hurst05hurst05 Member Posts: 1,567
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    =(((((B2-A2)/A2)*1000)*(C2/100))^0.33)*10+(B2/C2) Where B Winnings, A Buyin and C players. Gives a good spread of values, and rewards ROI, while taking into account buyin size and player field as well as winnings. I think it gives some pretty good results
    Posted by CoxyLboro
    lol my mind just asploded
    · Share on Twitter
  • AAelmoAAAAelmoAA Member Posts: 51
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : Deffo worth a gander, Mr AA. By the way, congrats on being the FIRST player to qualify for the £530 UKOPS High Roller! Now get the job finished, eh?
    Posted by Tikay10
    TY Tikay. Should be fun and hope I can spin it up.
    Yeah I think they use some multiplier function depending on feild size and buy-in. 

    Maybe your formula wasn't a million miles away....

    P.S. Don's suggestion seems reasonable.
    · Share on Twitter
  • rentisduerentisdue Member Posts: 227
    edited October 2011
    Why not do it on a number of runners in each event type of score board by quatering the field each time.

    Eg 400 runners = top 100 get 100 points, 101 to 200 get 75 points, 201 to 300 get 50 points and 301 to 400 get 25 points.

    Then give extra points to the payouts.

    Eg if 30 paid 1st gets 30 points and 30th gets 1 point.

    Bit simple i know but easy enough to understand and score.

    I know it will give anyone playing more events more chance of winning but imo anyone willing to join more events should have.

    Only a idea though so dont shoot me down :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • HITMAN_RVHITMAN_RV Member Posts: 8,688
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    square root of the prize money in each event added together would work
    Posted by aussie09
    Brilliant Rob, but will anyone else understand!!
    · Share on Twitter
  • SoLackSoLack Member Posts: 2,737
    edited October 2011
    What Ryan said - league points
    · Share on Twitter
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 173,875
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : Brilliant Rob, but will anyone else understand!!
    Posted by HITMAN_RV
    With due respect, if an Aussie can understand it........
    · Share on Twitter
  • BrownnDogBrownnDog Member Posts: 729
    edited October 2011
    Who ever knocks Tikay out in the most brutal fashion gets the most points and wins = simple!
    · Share on Twitter
  • dylan12dylan12 Member Posts: 2,343
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    Who ever knocks Tikay out in the most brutal fashion gets the most points and wins = simple!
    Posted by BrownnDog
    I would second this, fairest and funniest = win + win imo :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • DUNMIDOSHDUNMIDOSH Member Posts: 1,473
    edited October 2011

    IMO size of field has to be the most important factor
    The standard of player taking part will be elite in all competitions
    therefore structured points for finishing positions should be the same in all competitions
    with 1 bonus point added for every 50 players taking part.
    When Dylan 12 won the jackpot he triumphed over 500 in each comp his score would be 30 points for winning plus bonus 10 pts for the field
    whereas winning the roller would be 30 points for the win and just 1 point for the field because less players take part and fewer decisions have to be made.
    Cash prize money should be irrelevant skillfull play should be the only thing rewarded

    · Share on Twitter
  • kidwizzz78kidwizzz78 Member Posts: 158
    edited October 2011
    The easiest factor possible would be dont go buy the buy in to the tournies forget that it should be as said...

    6 WCOPS tournies , with these points bein with in close region it would apply a close league at the same time and make it more intresting.
     
    1st ... 100
    2nd .. 90
    3rd ... 80
    4th ... 70
    5th ... 60
    6th ... 50
    7th ... 40
    8th ... 30
    9th ... 20
    10th .. 10

    hope that helps
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.