You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Is this a record?
Tikay10
Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 160,052
in Poker Chat
Saw a Post this morning that had;
10 sentences.
25 exclamation marks.
Comments
Some good work you do here on the forums, i'm new to the forums but seen alot of your details posts, keep up the good work
he has evidence you know
Always meant to ask but never got around to it.
Surely posts like these are against the posting guidlines, e.g.
* Comments that can be construed to question Sky Poker's integrity, game fairness, security or random number generation
Nope, I'm sticking with 25.
You confuse my statement(s) also but hey you try your best to get a group mentality, matters nil
We no longer close threads willy-nilly, & we bend over backwards to avoid banning folks except in extreme circumstances.
It's a bit like being the referee in a big football match though, everyone sees these things differently, so there are always some happy, & some not so much.
Also the players colluding (mainly on cash) it's strange that players are not even addrressing this, abuse my post rather than the playere who collude together, surely you'd want them off and not collude/cheat?? Do you own research on that and you'll quickly and easily see that players colllude on cash.
Suppose it's easier to just ignore though hey and better still try and intimidate the one who speaks up...strange
If so... no 😉
Whenever I think-I've made over 1,000 posts on here. I have no life.
Then I see "Posts:50,421"
What can I say.
!!
No no, not at all, they are quite recent actually.
I mean your opening line of your thread says the following -:
I've gained 1000's and 1000's hands documented over the last 16 months, hands i've been involved in, hands i've not! it's become more and more clear that skypoker have set rng ranges for certain players, i refer to them as sponsored players.
So yes you are posting slanderous un founded statements saying sky poker cheat "its clear skypoker have set RNG ranges for certain player"
once again you make your arguments completely invalid.
This post should also serve as proof of how posting evidence helps
@clock123 - we are all waiting on baited breath for your research
I've read your other thread and have resisted commenting till now as I wanted to see how the points presented panned out and were commented on..so if I'm correct in understanding your position?
1) RNG
Most of the responses have replied to and been commented on and around the RNG...from my perspective I agree with you!
The RNG feels like its rigged when I get shafted on the river by, tbf its normally Matt Bates...apologies forgot, Matt likes to twist the knife and get his A on the flop AND again on the river to screw me over twice in one hand
Then again when I get a river card of a K which means my trip K's beat the AA I called, of course, then it's not rigged!!!( that's 4 @Tikay10)
I accept - as a low level, play for fun, not on the preferential RNG list kind of player-that the cards run for me as often as they run against me
2) Player collusion
I am more interested in the player collusion points you have identified as happening, you claim people don't want to discuss( I do) and you have evidence...I would appreciate you pm'ing me the list of names of the colluding players,so if I am ever planning to reg on a table and at least 2 of them are already there, I'll steer clear for sure!!!(7)
3) Punctuation in general?
! (8..no world records here today)
I look forward to receiving the list and just enjoy the ride! (9 sorry couldn't resist one more
GL at the tables
People have confused my statement of rng to be set for certain players continious, it's not, it changes, it needs to change to keep the game going, people are trying to downplay my statement making it about bad beats, making it about losses or wins, it's not, it's highlighting what the software is designed to do, keep the game going...the easiest example i can give is bandits in casinos, they have modes set inside the software when pay outs are restricted, bigger, smaller etc etc, the rng software is obviously alot more complex and obviously players style and all sorts come into consideration it works in a similar way...
As for players colluding i won't name names on here or private, i have 100% informed sky customer service (who are dreadful) of many things and supplied names and detailed evidence but nothing gets done, the same players were foing the same things week in week out so i just saved all the info for myself, if you truely want to see what happens spend some time on cash over the next months, you don't even have to play, just watch, you'll see for yourself quickly and easily...
Punctuation on a forum has nil value really does it, wonder if there is a world record for it though......
I like you play mainly for fun, i play what i can afford to lose and if i win bonus, like i say i win some and lose some, i enjoy the higher stakes too cos i agree the higher calibre of player is there, better poker, people seemed to assume too much, i'm fully aware there is great poker players about who probably 'make their own luck' too.
I opted for '.' Rather than '!' on this post (17)
Good luck and enjoy
Think it needs pointing out that there is a huge difference between "bandits" (or "slots" as they are known Online) & Poker, they are not comparable Products.
In slots/bandits, it's player v the house. And yes, the payout % can be adjusted up or down simply by dialling it in.
In poker, it is player v player. It does not matter to the House, as they charge a reg fee or rake, so they have no financial interest in who wins or loses, as they get their rake/reg fee anyway.
In that respect, Poker & Bingo are identical, it's player v player. Whereas in Casino (Roulette, Blackjack etc), Vegas & Bet, it's player v the house.
of course the colluding part refered to is simpler to try and give another example (again vague and less complex) ebay- people often used to (probably still do) get friends or family to bid on items so the person who actually wants to item gets it at an inflated price....so colluding players often bloat pots when their mate has a monster (communicate via a different platform) and wants max risk/max value, an example is if got aa or kk their mate bloats the pot hoping that one out of the group has a respectible hand but would likely be behind so for eg, ak,Jj, qq which are all more than playable in cash for high risks but now because of the colluding(the person with no interest in the pot only bloating it) it's almost certain to be isolated all in, higher reward due to colluding, obviously sometimes they will suck out but overall that technique will work...that's just one example of the colluding that 100% happens, nobobdy makes players enter, nobody makes players call, fold or raise etc but we all know there is a very lot of spots you can't get away from, particulary the very veey aggressive cash (you'll end up nil balanced within minutes if u sit and wait for absolute monsterd so it's a wider range and much more risk required on alot of the cash tables)
Like i said on another post it's life it happens, happens on bigger and smaller scales on much more important things than sky poker aswel, it will always happen, it's life, lets just not pretend it doesnt is my point
Work on your confidence, you won't need to be part of groups nor try and isolate people, strange odd individual...