You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

i won with Jacks..

philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
edited April 2010 in Poker Chat
Makes a nice change.
miamigo Small blind  15.00 15.00 2055.00
MrPloppy Big blind  30.00 45.00 1870.00
  Your hole cards
  • J
  • J
     
unlukky Call  30.00 75.00 2050.00
winnie66 Call  30.00 105.00 1930.00
philmenow Raise  90.00 195.00 1810.00
jasseaf125 Fold     
miamigo Fold     
MrPloppy Call  60.00 255.00 1810.00
unlukky Call  60.00 315.00 1990.00
winnie66 Fold     
Flop
   
  • 9
  • J
  • K
     
MrPloppy Check     
unlukky Check     
philmenow Bet  120.00 435.00 1690.00
MrPloppy Fold     
unlukkyCall  120.00 555.00 1870.00
Turn
   
  • 10
     
unlukky Check     
philmenow Check     
River
   
  • 10
     
unlukky Bet  555.00 1110.00 1315.00
philmenow Raise  1110.00 2220.00 580.00
unlukky All-in  1315.00 3535.00 0.00
philmenow All-in  580.00 4115.00 0.00
unlukky Unmatched bet  180.00 3935.00 180.00
unlukky Show
  • 10
  • 9
   
philmenow Show
  • J
  • J
   
philmenow Win Full House, Jacks and 10s 3935.00  3935.00

Comments

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited April 2010

    I bet you cant win with jacks, without hitting a jack ;)
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: Well bhugger me,i won with Jacks..:
    I bet you cant win with jacks, without hitting a jack ;)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    no, never..was also very suprised 'unlukky' never turnt over KK or 1010
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited April 2010
    see theyv edited/censored the title then..
  • Sky_RichSky_Rich Member Posts: 3,837
    edited April 2010
    just a quick note - i have slightly edited your title philmenow. nothing too drastic but thought i'd let you know.

    Thanks.
  • Sky_RichSky_Rich Member Posts: 3,837
    edited April 2010
    oops we were posting at the same time.

    yes, i edited your title. i felt it wasn't really appropriate.

    thanks (in advance) for being understanding
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited April 2010
    Well yeh theyre gonna aint they !!! 

    I canny believe some people r so paranoid with jacks! - How do u feel about tens??? lol
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    just a quick note - i have slightly edited your title philmenow. nothing too drastic but thought i'd let you know. Thanks.
    Posted by Sky_Rich[/QUOT
    thanx 4 that rich ,i had noticed..no probz tho..
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    Well yeh theyre gonna aint they !!!  I canny believe some people r so paranoid with jacks! - How do u feel about tens??? lol
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    im paranoid with any pair tbh..only a pair afterall..wouldnt be so bad if people here didnt call the raises with raggy muck,then its quite hard to know where im at..
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited April 2010
    I tend to have more luck with pocket 5s or 9s I know their is know logic to it but they work for me!
  • FlutNushFlutNush Member Posts: 371
    edited April 2010
    I once won very handsomely with pocket Jacks, when hitting a set on the flop – and then quads on the turn.

    I remember thinking that if I managed to hit a quintet on the river, then I'd really start to feel confident, and would even consider making a small value-bet.
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG Member Posts: 7,155
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    I once won very handsomely with pocket Jacks, when hitting a set on the flop – and then quads on the turn. I remember thinking that if I managed to hit a quintet on the river, then I'd really start to feel confident, and would even consider making a small value-bet.
    Posted by FlutNush
    lol u defo come from the tikay school of poker methinks:)
  • FlutNushFlutNush Member Posts: 371
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks.. : lol u defo come from the tikay school of poker methinks:)
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    Yep, sometimes, I play so tight, I squeak. One day I plan to open my range of starting hands, to include pocket tens (in late position in unopened pots only, obviously). 

    That ought to be frightening, but enlightening.
     ;)
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG Member Posts: 7,155
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks.. : Yep, sometimes, I play so tight, I squeak. One day I plan to open my range of starting hands, to include pocket tens (in late position in unopened pots only, obviously).  That ought to be frightening, but enlightening.  ;)
    Posted by FlutNush
    WOOOOOOOOOOOOAHHHHH, NO NO NO! 

    Rule 135b subsection 5 of the tikay rulez of pokerage ($1.25 at all good book shops, and some bad ones)

    "Pocket Tens ARE AN INSTANT FOLD, any position, any situation".

    hope this helps, what ever next, soon you will suggest that AQs is a playable hand... no, it only gets you in trouble:)

  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited April 2010
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks..:
    In Response to Re: i won with Jacks.. : WOOOOOOOOOOOOAHHHHH, NO NO NO!  Rule 135b subsection 5 of the tikay rulez of pokerage ($1.25 at all good book shops, and some bad ones) "Pocket Tens ARE AN INSTANT FOLD, any position, any situation". hope this helps, what ever next, soon you will suggest that AQs is a playable hand... no, it only gets you in trouble:)
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    lol,funny that,lost to 1010 with suited AK,neither of us hit...went out in 4th in DYM,dunno what i was thinking..obviously wasnt thinking about just making the money..as he had raised..i shoved..doh..evryday a hard lesson is learnt..oh well.
Sign In or Register to comment.