You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Options
MICRO MADNESS
Bustertown
Member Posts: 71
I don't normally post on any forums anywhere, so I'll regret this later but here goes.
Whilst I think "Micro Madness" in principle in is a very good idea, is it not slightly flawed? Obviously, Skypoker are getting increase rake, as right now (Tuesday 5.50pm) there are 22 x 2p/4p tables open, which is far more than usual. However, most players are ones who would be playing at higher (possibly quite a bit higher) levels. Also - and this the part where people will say: "so this is why the moaning!" - they are much better players than the usual 2p/4p regulars (yes, like myself) who are perhaps now outclassed and losing their money.
My apologies to anyone who feels they are not outclassed as are there some decent players at those levels. However, for whatever reason, they choose to play regularly at these stakes to maintain a consistent bankroll.
The software probably would not allow this, but would it not be better to have ringfenced some 2p/4p tables for such players who really want to play for fun - as in opt-out of "Micro Madness" tables?
Just to be clear, I am not criticising the idea of "Micro Madness". I am more suggesting an enhancement to it.
Whilst I think "Micro Madness" in principle in is a very good idea, is it not slightly flawed? Obviously, Skypoker are getting increase rake, as right now (Tuesday 5.50pm) there are 22 x 2p/4p tables open, which is far more than usual. However, most players are ones who would be playing at higher (possibly quite a bit higher) levels. Also - and this the part where people will say: "so this is why the moaning!" - they are much better players than the usual 2p/4p regulars (yes, like myself) who are perhaps now outclassed and losing their money.
My apologies to anyone who feels they are not outclassed as are there some decent players at those levels. However, for whatever reason, they choose to play regularly at these stakes to maintain a consistent bankroll.
The software probably would not allow this, but would it not be better to have ringfenced some 2p/4p tables for such players who really want to play for fun - as in opt-out of "Micro Madness" tables?
Just to be clear, I am not criticising the idea of "Micro Madness". I am more suggesting an enhancement to it.
Comments
It's also been quite good to test myself against obvious better players, who would normally play slightly higher. It has been cheaper than moving up to their level.