One for the twitterati

GELDY

just got an email - having signed up to follow skypoker on twitter the other day. Now I'm sure skypoker will be happy with the skyvegas link - but the others? Wouldn't we be rather shown links to Tikay & James Hartigan.

In website land you can optimise your site to appear better in searches - does such a thing exist in twitterland? If so I guess skypoker should do some optimisation. If not how do you avoid your followers getting sucked into a competitor?

 in case it doesn't show, they are:

Nick Wealthall @nickwealthall

Paul Jackson @Action_Jack

Sky Vegas @skyvegas

blondepoker @blondepoker

Cake Poker @CakePoker

Similar to Sky Poker         Nick Wealthall @nickwealthall TV presenter, Comedy writer, Poker player, LFC supporter, Housewives... Followed by Sky Poker.      Follow             Paul Jackson @Action_Jack Poker Player Followed by Sky Poker.      Follow             Sky Vegas @skyvegas Big brand slot games & classics like Blackjack and Roulette. £10 free... Followed by Sky Poker.      Follow             blondepoker @blondepoker Europe's leading poker forum, and Live Poker Updates From Across the UK,... Followed by Sky Poker.      Follow             Cake Poker @CakePoker Cake Poker is a poker, casino, dice and game online community with a... Followed by Sky Poker.      Follow

TommyD

I'm up for correction but I'm pretty sure the suggestions you get are correlations between who you follow, who follows you, who you follow follows and who follows who you follow.  You follow?

In other words it's pretty tough to make sure the suggestions to one person or thing standard, plus I'm sure there's a random element to it when they pluck some of them out.

FlyingDagg

In Response to Re: One for the twitterati:

I'm up for correction but I'm pretty sure the suggestions you get are correlations between who you follow, who follows you, who you follow follows and who follows who you follow.  You follow? In other words it's pretty tough to make sure the suggestions to one person or thing standard, plus I'm sure there's a random element to it when they pluck some of them out.
Posted by TommyD

I'll bet even you had trouble understanding that Tommy

TommyD

In Response to Re: One for the twitterati:

In Response to Re: One for the twitterati : I'll bet even you had trouble understanding that Tommy
Posted by FlyingDagg

I had an advantage Dagg, I typed it and therefore didn't have to understand it

VespaPX

In Response to Re: One for the twitterati:

I'm up for correction but I'm pretty sure the suggestions you get are correlations between who you follow, who follows you, who you follow follows and who follows who you follow.  You follow? In other words it's pretty tough to make sure the suggestions to one person or thing standard, plus I'm sure there's a random element to it when they pluck some of them out.
Posted by TommyD

Flocking **** !