In this hand here, opponent has just sat down at the table, I have no reads at all.
I'm in the bb with pocket queens. It is raised 4 times BB then Button reraises 4 times the initial raise to64p total. Given this massive bet it looks like Aces, Kings Maybe Ace King, though i doubt it. Possibly this could be getting done with Jacks Tens or Queens, don't really think opponent is making a move.
I thought i would call to see a flop, flop comes down Ace high opponent over bets the pot on the flop. I'm quite happy with my fold there is very little i am beating here. Do you think it's a bad call preflop? The reason i didn't ship preflop was I don't know the opponent, and so easily at this level abig bet like this signifies aces or kings.
Edit; I don't know if i can fold preflop here, maybe there is an argument for it. I've just checked out opponent on sharkscope, he looks like a decent enough player. If the flop doesn't come down Ace or King high, i'm probably still not loving my hand. The only thing i am beating here is a bluff. I dont see him betting that big with pocket Aces, surely he would check it to me if he had this strong a hand? If he had Kings the Ace would surely have slowed the action down? The only real hand that makes any sense is AK??
bokata | Small blind | | £0.02 | £0.02 | £7.91 |
LARSON7 | Big blind | | £0.04 | £0.06 | £4.89 |
| Your hole cards | | | | |
THDARKLORD | Fold | | | | |
nance03 | Raise | | £0.16 | £0.22 | £7.91 |
pokermask | Raise | | £0.64 | £0.86 | £3.37 |
bokata | Fold | | | | |
LARSON7 | Call | | £0.60 | £1.46 | £4.29 |
nance03 | Fold | | | | |
Flop |
---|
| | | | | |
LARSON7 | Check | | | | |
pokermask | Bet | | £1.68 | £3.14 | £1.69 |
LARSON7 | Fold | | | | |
pokermask | Muck | | | | |
pokermask | Win | | £1.35 | | £3.04 |
pokermask | Return | | £1.68 |
Comments
if he is a decent play he probably has a wider hand range OTB because he probably knows how wide a hand range their is with most nl4p.
i myself reraise things such as JJ and AQ if the orig raise was just 12p
You have called because you think nobody ever 3bets without AA/KK, but where are you now? You are out of possition with what should be a monster hand and you have no idea where you are. The villian could have A-rag and would have folded to a 4bet, they could have JJ and you have just folded the best hand.
I'm quite happy with how i'm playing at cash at the moment, and i'm winning, maximising on value and limiting losses, folding at the right times. It just didn't feel right here, i wasn't at all confident with my Queens (in this positon/ situation).
But yeah, maybe i should have just 4 bet it, i normally give someone credit the first time.
haha brilliant mate.
Yeah im outa position, that's why i said i should of maybe folded pre.
A bet like this, at this level, normally means aces or kings
I still say get it in until you have reads.
I doubt many 4NL players 3b bluff with Ax.
I say this from personal experience. I don't know what level you play at, but generally speaking people at this level are quite honest. It's really unusual for someone to 3 bet light, I can't even remember the last time i seen a 3 bet with AJ/ AQ.
An hours session tonight the only 2 big pots i lost were all in preflop vrs ACES lol
You definitely can't call the 3-bet with the stacks and it's probably not too bad to get it in if you think the guy is a bit spewy. If he's been quiet or very passive then you can perhaps find the fold. I doubt you'll pay him off again, at least.