I play 3 poker sites and they all meet my needs this one too,But ive never seen so many quad hands in my life as i have on here.This is by no means a complaint because ive had about 5 quad hands on here but on the other sites ive probably had 5 quad hands in the 3 years and ive only been on sky a month,Keep it up if i keep getting the 5555,9999,AAAA,2222,2222.
0 ·
Comments
Surely it's the complete opposite and it's more likely on a full ring table and that's why we should be tighter on a full ring table. More hands being dealt, more hands in play, more chance that someone will make X hand. In the same way that, if you're playing HU, making TP is massive, making TP multiway in a 10handed game... not so massive.
Again, like Omaha, more cards out there, so quads become much more likely than in hold 'em.
Why would shorter handed tables mean increased odds of a particular hand?
You're joking right Donald
things like quads and straight flushes i think the odds of hitting them on a 6 table compared to a 10 table can be quite hard to know which is more likely. on 10 handed tables i think the odds that quads will come for any villian are increased but the odds that you will be the villian who hits it are decreased and vis versa with 6 hand tables.
what gets me thinking this myself is when i was on 10 seated tables i saw so many more times when two people had AA preflop whereas on the 6 seated tables i hardly ever see two hold the same hand combo.
http://t.co/1npA6MTwAq
(got paid in full by limped pocket 99)