We're sure you've all seen Andew1947's victory in the weekend Super Roller.
This has sparked the usual 'experience' vs 'youth' banter. Which got us thinking...
How might you prove which age group is best? (if any). It would be difficult to prove this 100% this with something short-term and for all the different forms of poker, but at least it would give some banter and bragging rights!
Any ideas? - assuming we start with holdem tournaments for example.
0 ·
Comments
Bring it on!
PS - Which side would I be on - "Experience" or "Youth"?
Just asking.
Or you could do a battle of the ages tournament on the community night
Part of the youth v experience thing is a lot of young players have more experience than the old players given youngster multi table.
Also, what age is the cut off point?
you know you're old when you forget how old you are...
(* *)
^
dev
Bluffing again Julian, sigh.
You can look after the wrinklies if you wish.
ID please
im sure loose aggressive in cash games is probably the better way to approach the game,
but in MTTs you have to play conserative when the blinds are cheap and no antes thus making the older generation better at early stages.
As the blinds increase the loose aggressive player will take advantage making more steals/resteals
but gives up a little percentage so he can aim for the big score instead of mincashing etc thus making 1,2 and 3rd more of a likely outcome when he runs good. As for the tight player, He will generally still play tight and hope to win flips when his chips are depleating and doesnt put him self in the position to win the MTT as much.
Think i kind of answered it the best i could in about 5 mins,
yoyo do you want to play heads up hyper turbos??