You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
walks2311 | Small blind | £0.10 | £0.10 | £53.69 | |
steve1602 | Big blind | £0.20 | £0.30 | £21.74 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
Superman_ | Fold | ||||
DN34689 | Fold | ||||
trevor1954 | Call | £0.20 | £0.50 | £21.40 | |
robbie1992 | Raise | £0.80 | £1.30 | £27.51 | |
walks2311 | Fold | ||||
steve1602 | Raise | £2.40 | £3.70 | £19.34 | |
trevor1954 | Fold | ||||
robbie1992 | Raise | £6.20 | £9.90 | £21.31 | |
steve1602 | All-in | £19.34 | £29.24 | £0.00 | |
robbie1992 | Call | £14.94 | £44.18 | £6.37 | |
steve1602 | Show |
| |||
robbie1992 | Show |
| |||
Flop | |||||
| |||||
Turn | |||||
| |||||
River | |||||
| |||||
steve1602 | Win | Three Kings | £42.38 | £42.38 |
Comments
Yeah but is it a bad beat? thats what im asking, or is it just not a +ev situation? u rarely see jj shown and even when its ak your only a flip
If you think that when you 4bet, he is only ever gonna call or 5bet get it in with KK and AA, then what's the point in 4betting? If you think he'll get it in with AA,KK,QQ,JJ,AK, maybe TT, then you can 4bet and get it in.
Assuming he's not a massive nit, he'll probably be 3betting AK, AQ, TT+ and some SCs like JTs, 9Ts, 89s etc, so we can just flat and play against a range we crush.
So if we're 4betting knowing he will only continue with hands that crush us, why would we 4bet?
Now it's down to you whether you have reads or not. If we're readless, then I don't mind 4bet getting it in, or flatting the 3bet, but you need to making notes on what people are 3/4/5betting
^This is your problem!
Not that you're overrating hands but that you're thinking about the absolute value of your hand. You need to think about the relative value of your hand. You have to judge your hand's strength against your opponent's range, not just think "I have QQ! Yipee!!"
This hand is very reminiscent of another hand you posted a few weeks ago. You weren't thinking about how your hand played against that opponent's range either. Instead of repeating myself I'll just link it up. My thoughts remain the same.
This one.
Then you think "Does my hand beat that range?" If your opponent's range is only AA and KK, then the fact that QQ is the third best hand in poker is totally irrelevant.
If you opponent's range is really wide, then JJ and TT may also be beating him, so again the fact that QQ is the third best hand in poker is irrelevant.
The only thing that's relevant is how your hand plays against your opponent's range. Forget that QQ is the third best possible hand because it's never relevant on it's own.
Robbie,
i'm no expert,obviously,but for me i'm only ever going to be getting around 100 bb in with KK or AA
and i'm sure there must be many others that think the same way.
to be getting QQ in I would need very good reads on opponent and even then I would be getting it in reluctantly,as these players can and do get KK & AA dealt too.
I don't know the stats regarding getting QQ aipf but i'm guessing it must be a close call as to a fold.
dev