You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Avoiding multi tablers on cash

FreeFlopFreeFlop Member Posts: 2
edited July 2013 in Poker Chat
apologies if this has been covered nut a search of multi table brings up many many discussions.

I would like to ask if any body would like to see cash tables set up for people who only play one game at a time, i know this potentially would be seen by any poker site as a bad thing ad more players and games at a time means more rake but i am pretty fed up of trying to find a low stakes cash game which hasnt got some of the same names on it who seem to play every table available who can take ages to make their decisions and who are very often sat out at a couple. Being sat out is particularly annoying if you have a couple at the table as they are only six seat to start with.
«1

Comments

  • FlashFlushFlashFlush Member Posts: 4,494
    edited July 2013
    That's unlikely to happen, my suggestion would be to start a new table yourself, normally they are too busy multi tabling to see a new table start, it will probably fill with them eventually, but then stand and start a new one...
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,495
    edited July 2013
    Sky could introduce cam tables!, which means you can only be on 1 cam table at a time,

    It means people would just be playing one table, and they are cracking fun too!
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited July 2013
    inb4 Sky introduce Cam Tables in 2093
  • THEROCK573THEROCK573 Member Posts: 2,550
    edited July 2013
    who in this day and age one tables?
  • ACEGOONERACEGOONER Member Posts: 1,435
    edited July 2013
    I avoid cash multi tablers by play hu sngs, simples ;)
  • 4EVERGREEN4EVERGREEN Member Posts: 244
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    who in this day and age one tables?
    Posted by THEROCK573
    I do and I've barely got the attention span to cope with that.

    Sad but true.
  • calcalfoldcalcalfold Member Posts: 978
    edited July 2013
    The only aspect of your post that really needs any action from Sky, imo, is the sitting out part. The time before a player getting booted is way too long. This should be 2minutes max imo. If they need to go for a smoke or something then they can find a new table when they come back.

    With regards you not wanting to play against the same people who take ages over decisions.

    Well your basically saying you dont want to play regs that actually use their brains. I wonder why that is.......
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,495
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    The only aspect of your post that really needs any action from Sky, imo, is the sitting out part. The time before a player getting booted is way too long. This should be 2minutes max imo. If they need to go for a smoke or something then they can find a new table when they come back. With regards you not wanting to play against the same people who take ages over decisions. Well your basically saying you dont want to play regs that actually use their brains. I wonder why that is.......
    Posted by calcalfold
    He wants to play some pokkers

    Another fine post calc lol
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited July 2013
    2 minutes or booted from the table is pretty harsh. 5 is fairer. Can do plenty in 5 minutes. ;)
  • 68Trebor68Trebor Member Posts: 1,944
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    inb4 Sky introduce Cam Tables in 2093
    Posted by percival09
     That's a bit optimistic.
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,495
    edited July 2013
    Cam tables 4 Sky poker 2013! It can't be that difficult lol
  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited July 2013
    just admit you want to have a table which never has aggression because those who multi table have lot's of money so usually charge big bet's which worries those who have the money to single table
    them who just have difficult multi tabling won't be bothered about them who can multi table.
    my tip
    go onto the Omaha tables
    they have pot limits so bet's start small and you are lucky to find even 1 table with people.
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited July 2013
    Wow so much craziness ^^^

    First of all, PLO is ridic swingy compared to Omaha. You're gonna be getting in stacks WAY more often and rarely as that big a favourite. That's aside from the fact OP might not know how to play PLO.

    Also, I don't think it's agression that people don't like, he's probably annoyed by the people who just sit there nut peddling trying to take money off 'fish', so they sit there for ages folding then as soon as OP gets any action it's cos he's against like KK+ pre or a set+ post
  • ajs4385ajs4385 Member Posts: 455
    edited July 2013

    Best site to play is Sky to avoid multitablers.

    888 also a good one as it has limited multitabling and shown good growth since doing so.

    The problem is not multitabling but mass multitabling where people are playing too many tables and taking ages to fold pre flop.

    Would be beneficial to have a limit on multi tabling as someone playing eg 18 tables is going to slow the games down and it puts recreational players off from playing.

  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited July 2013
    then again maybe it could just be another person who is annoyed with how the tables are this week.
    if i was a single tabler i probably would be even more unhappy with this promo because it's like i said in another post people like me want varience but not a table filled 4+ who fold nearly everything.
  • SmitalosSmitalos Member Posts: 543
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    Wow so much craziness ^^^ First of all, PLO is ridic swingy compared to Omaha.
    gg


     
    Also, I don't think it's agression that people don't like, he's probably annoyed by the people who just sit there nut peddling trying to take money off 'fish', so they sit there for ages folding then as soon as OP gets any action it's cos he's against like KK+ pre or a set+ post
    Posted by Lambert180
    This. A million times over.
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited July 2013
    Sigh

    Hold 'em*
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    Best site to play is Sky to avoid multitablers. 888 also a good one as it has limited multitabling and shown good growth since doing so. The problem is not multitabling but mass multitabling where people are playing too many tables and taking ages to fold pre flop. Would be beneficial to have a limit on multi tabling as someone playing eg 18 tables is going to slow the games down and it puts recreational players off from playing.
    Posted by ajs4385
    Nits gonna nit. 

    Who folds these days. 

    Folding is over-rated
  • pilgrim07pilgrim07 Member Posts: 232
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash : I do and I've barely got the attention span to cope with that. Sad but true.
    Posted by 4EVERGREEN
    Sadly, +1
  • Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,492
    edited July 2013
    In Response to Re: Avoiding multi tablers on cash:
    The only aspect of your post that really needs any action from Sky, imo, is the sitting out part. The time before a player getting booted is way too long. This should be 2minutes max imo. If they need to go for a smoke or something then they can find a new table when they come back. With regards you not wanting to play against the same people who take ages over decisions. Well your basically saying you dont want to play regs that actually use their brains. I wonder why that is.......
    Posted by calcalfold
    469 posts from you.

    Struggling to remember one where you haven't had a dig of some kind.
    I seem to remember you claimed it was just that you were witty or not going to be soft with people. Something like that.

    I would describe it differently.

    ..

    Oh, and as you also pick people up on their spelling.
    "You're" would have been correct.
Sign In or Register to comment.