PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalancewineliSmall blind 20.0020.001940.00oldgolfBig blind 40.0060.002085.00 Your hole cardsQQ raffles65Raise 80.00140.002275.00rivermunkyRaise 200.00340.004785.00SchmegEyeCall 200.00540.001325.00bbMikeFold wineliFold oldgolfFold raffles65Call 120.00660.002155.00Flop 764 raffles65Check rivermunkyBet 660.001320.004125.00SchmegEyeFold raffles65All-in 2155.003475.000.00rivermunkyCall 1495.004970.002630.00raffles65Show5A rivermunkyShowQQ Turn 8 River 6 raffles65WinStraight to the 84970.00 4970.0
0 ·
Comments
They still played it pretty poor.
Not in the clinic, so I won't go into too much detail...
However, if you're going to question your opponent's decision-making, you should probably question your own, too.
If you don't think your opponent can justify getting his stack in on this flop with a draw, then you should be asking yourself whether your full-pot bet sizing was a good one. You're relying on your opponent making a big mistake because you've left him with (what should be) the impression that he has no fold equity with his drawing hands.
As it happens he got it in with 40% equity, so if he believes he has any fold equity - i.e. he believes there is some chance you may fold, even after your full-pot bet - then his shove is definitely good. Even if you call every time, his pot-odds are 43% so he's not that far wrong.
Regardless of what you think of your opponent's play, you've pretty much played your hand face up. After you full-pot it on the flop, I'd be expecting you to never fold. This type of play allows good opponents to play easy, perfect poker against you. You need to look at that and question your own thought processes.
people get so results orientated but realyy both players played it fine imo...poker gods rule!