You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Is this a callor a fold?

LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,491
edited September 2013 in The Poker Clinic
Or is it not worth doubling them up? Despite the fact we prob have the odds to call, or do i have the odds to call?
18k in the middle, and 37k 2 call to win 998400.


WHEELS7161 Small blind  6000.00 6000.00 43920.00
LARSON7 Big blind  12000.00 18000.00 293080.00
  Your hole cards
  • Q
  • 2
     
WHEELS7161 All-in  43920.00 61920.00 0.00
LARSON7 Call  37920.00 99840.00 255160.00
WHEELS7161 Show
  • A
  • 6
   
LARSON7 Show
  • Q
  • 2
   
Flop
   
  • 7
  • 8
  • 7
     
Turn
   
  • 6
     
River
   
  • K
     
WHEELS7161 Win Two Pairs, 7s and 6s 99840

Comments

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2013

    Snap :)
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited September 2013
    In Response to Re: Is this a callor a fold?:
    Snap :)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    I'm not so sure. Odds are probably saying call, but we have such an awful hand that just doesn't do anything. It's not even suited! I'm more concerned about needlessly doubling them up, thus giving them really good fold equity for future jams.

    Meh, I'm probably wrong but I think we can let Q2o go and stick them in next hand with almost any 2.
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2013
    I know sky players r wayyyy tighter than they should be, but even if he's shoving the top 20% of hands (should be closer to 100% than 20%) we still have 31%

    equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 31.302% 30.39% 00.92% 1560939672 47035266.00 { Q2o }Hand 1: 68.698% 67.78% 00.92% 3481901796 47035266.00 { 66+, A4s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }


    We only need 27% I think? Something like that anyway.


    Queen is the 3rd highest card in the deck, it could/should/will be ahead pre a lot. Lets gooooooo :)

    *Edit, think I've messed the maths up, we need 36% not 27%?

    Meh prob still got it although it's not as obvious as I first thought.

    Never bother working this stuff out just looks like a call? If I'm wrong it's a big ugly leak found :)
  • F_IvanovicF_Ivanovic Member Posts: 2,410
    edited September 2013
    meh q2 is just really bad. q6+ and this prob becomes a snap but q2 I guess just doesn't have a lot of equity vs even a really wide range. Seriously though, stop posting questions like this in the clinic and download pokerstove (or use a web based alternative) - will be a lot more useful to you!
Sign In or Register to comment.