You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

20NL - Standard Snap Off Spot?

Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
edited September 2013 in The Poker Clinic
On the downswingaments as you know so probably just looking for re-assurance here...

Thoughts on going to £3 total with my 4bet after the tiny 3bet? More, less or perfect?

Standard snap 'em off spot? I bet small deliberately to allow someone to ship a FD or a weaker OP that they might not feel so comfortable with if I go like £7-8... although wasn't expecting 2 ships.
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
hornetjim Small blind   £0.10 £0.10 £19.50
jensen1986 Big blind   £0.20 £0.30 £11.06
  Your hole cards
  • K
  • K
     
Lambert180 Raise   £0.60 £0.90 £18.16
Amy Raise   £1.00 £1.90 £19.34
Sheldon Call   £1.00 £2.90 £18.83
routeledge Fold        
hornetjim Fold        
jensen1986 Call   £0.80 £3.70 £10.26
Lambert180 Raise   £2.40 £6.10 £15.76
Amy Call   £2.00 £8.10 £17.34
Sheldon Call   £2.00 £10.10 £16.83
jensen1986 Call   £2.00 £12.10 £8.26
Flop
   
  • 10
  • 9
  • 2
     
jensen1986 Check        
Lambert180 Bet   £3.00 £15.10 £12.76
Amy All-in   £17.34 £32.44 £0.00
Sheldon All-in   £16.83 £49.27 £0.00
jensen1986 Fold        
Lambert180 All-in   £12.76 £62.03 £0.00
           
           
           
           

           

           
           

Comments

  • F_IvanovicF_Ivanovic Member Posts: 2,410
    edited September 2013
    Go bigger pre-flop. Table seems fishy and we want to try and isolate with KK or get it 3 way at most. There's already £3.70 in the spot and I so I'd probably make it 3.70ish total more.

    I'm not a fan of the small flop bet in this particular spot because the board is somewhat wet and we're 4 way. If it was T92r or T52 with one FD then you can definitely bet smaller (although even then I'd go at least £5) - only time I would bet your size is if it was T52r.

    Also I really can't see these players folding overpairs here. You might get more calls with 9x or some hands like 55-88 to call but you're also inviting flush draws/straight draws as well as allowing Tx and 9x to hit 2 pairs. And when they do call you haven't defined their range at all and there are going to be a lot of turn cards where you now might not be sure if you are ahead or not.

    This particular flop I think around £7 is a nice bet size. As played you have to call it off really w/o any specific reads. One of them might have flopped a set but you probably induced somewhat lighter shoves from your small bet size (one good reason to bet this small could be that if at least a couple of villains are aggressive) - but if only 1 is aggressive and most are passive definitely a bigger sizing is the way to go.
  • BorinLonerBorinLoner Member Posts: 3,863
    edited September 2013
    In Response to Re: 20NL - Standard Snap Off Spot?:
    Go bigger pre-flop. Table seems fishy and we want to try and isolate with KK or get it 3 way at most. There's already £3.70 in the spot and I so I'd probably make it 3.70ish total more. I'm not a fan of the small flop bet in this particular spot because the board is somewhat wet and we're 4 way. If it was T92r or T52 with one FD then you can definitely bet smaller (although even then I'd go at least £5) - only time I would bet your size is if it was T52r. Also I really can't see these players folding overpairs here. You might get more calls with 9x or some hands like 55-88 to call but you're also inviting flush draws/straight draws as well as allowing Tx and 9x to hit 2 pairs. And when they do call you haven't defined their range at all and there are going to be a lot of turn cards where you now might not be sure if you are ahead or not. This particular flop I think around £7 is a nice bet size. As played you have to call it off really w/o any specific reads. One of them might have flopped a set but you probably induced somewhat lighter shoves from your small bet size (one good reason to bet this small could be that if at least a couple of villains are aggressive) - but if only 1 is aggressive and most are passive definitely a bigger sizing is the way to go.
    Posted by F_Ivanovic
    +1 to most of this.

    Think the flop call is more of a PokerStove question, though. Are either of these guys flatting 4-bets with AT? We want them stacking off on the flop with weaker pairs in 4-bet pots, so it would be nice to think they're a bit spewy. We can't just hope they're both playing draws, after all.

    Obviously we can't fold if they can have JJ, QQ or AT type hands with 4:1 on our money.
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited September 2013
    Not loving it versus two but still calling with that price and against the releastic range of not always facing a set
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited September 2013
    Cheers guys. Again just wanting re-assurance.

    I was up against QQ and AQdd and obv didn't hold.
Sign In or Register to comment.