All Categories› The Poker Clinic

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

More Aggression Needed?

peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
edited October 2013 in The Poker Clinic
Hi guys,

My question is should I have been betting the river here? I'm guessing you guys will say yes because I had top pair, but after he called my bets on the flop and turn, I suspected he may have two pair. Didn't relly know much about the opposition at this point.
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
nimmo06 Small blind   25.00 25.00 3093.75
peter27 Big blind   50.00 75.00 2030.00
  Your hole cards
  • J
  • 9
     
mickeybo Fold        
SebB5 Fold        
bobster111 Fold        
revchris Fold        
nimmo06 Call   25.00 100.00 3068.75
peter27 Check        
Flop
   
  • 2
  • 9
  • 7
     
nimmo06 Bet   75.00 175.00 2993.75
peter27 Raise   200.00 375.00 1830.00
nimmo06 Call   125.00 500.00 2868.75
Turn
   
  • 8
     
nimmo06 Check        
peter27 Bet   250.00 750.00 1580.00
nimmo06 Call   250.00 1000.00 2618.75
River
   
  • 4
     
nimmo06 Check        
peter27 Check        
nimmo06 Show
  • 7
  • K
     
peter27 Show
  • J
  • 9
     
peter27 Win Pair of 9s 1000.00   2580.00
· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • a00rocka00rock Member Posts: 832
    edited October 2013
    Top pair decent kicker a check is fine IMO.
    · Share on Twitter
  • Phantom66Phantom66 Member Posts: 5,542
    edited October 2013
    Looks fine to me

    River is a brick but opponent has called your flop raise and your river bet.

    villain has seen you be aggressive on earlier streets so check could be to induce you again.

    789 on board is worrying for 2 pairs and str8s and trips are possible too as villain could have made up blind with small/mid pair. TT also possible.

    If you bet you are not beating anything that will (or should) call you except maybe T9?


    · Share on Twitter
  • F_IvanovicF_Ivanovic Member Posts: 2,410
    edited October 2013
    Checking is fine w/o reads. Thinnest I might go for value is with K9+
    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited October 2013
    In Response to Re: More Aggression Needed?:
    If you bet you are not beating anything that will (or should) call you except maybe T9?
    Posted by Phantom66
    Good point, and I did consider this myself however when playing at such low stakes like I have been recently, I don't think you can rely on this as so much of the play is - let's say - unconventional.
    · Share on Twitter
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,592
    edited October 2013
    In Response to Re: More Aggression Needed?:
    In Response to Re: More Aggression Needed? : Good point, and I did consider this myself however when playing at such low stakes like I have been recently, I don't think you can rely on this as so much of the play is - let's say - unconventional.
    Posted by peter27
    Ain't that the truth? :)

    Yeah, I almost always check on the river, because I usually worry about those two pair combos as well.
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.