You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

A poker version of Super6?

Sky_PokerSky_Poker Member Posts: 2,715
edited November 2013 in Poker Chat

Hi everyone

We're sure many of you are familiar with Super6, the free to play game where you can win £250,000 (up to £1m some weeks!) by predicting scores in the football. In fact a few weeks ago, someone won £250,000 by winning this, all for nothing!

So, heres a thought - if there was a poker version of Super6 how would you design it? What would be the format and what would you need to do to win it?

It would obviously have to be quite tough to win without being impossible. Think like the Sky Poker Jackpot but a bit tougher (with it being free).

Let's assume its free to play and top prize is £100,000.

Thanks
Sky Poker
«1

Comments

  • jdsallstarjdsallstar Member Posts: 1,675
    edited November 2013
    In Response to A poker version of Super6?:
    Hi everyone We're sure many of you are familiar with Super6, the free to play game where you can win £250,000 (up to £1m some weeks!) by predicting scores in the football. In fact a few weeks ago, someone won £250,000 by winning this, all for nothing! So, heres a thought - if there was a poker version of Super6 how would you design it? What would be the format and what would you need to do to win it? It would obviously have to be quite tough to win without being impossible. Think like the Sky Poker Jackpot but a bit tougher (with it being free). Let's assume its free to play and top prize is £100,000. Thanks Sky Poker
    Posted by Sky_Poker
    Pick 6 tournamets and pick what hand the winner has that wins it i.e. high card/one pair/2 pair/3 of a kind etc etc. One pair might be too popular an answer/result though!
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited November 2013
    Needs to be something that's easily checked so something like winners of the bigger MTTs would be easy thanks to GaryQQQ's thread.

    This idea would certainly be very tough but it might lean more towards impossible lol...

    People have to pick 7 names and these need to be the 7 ME winners of the week. If you wanna keep it to 6, then just choose 6 of the MEs (imo the one to exclude is the Turbo Tuesday just cos it's even harder to try and pick who will win that).

    Now that idea is virtually impossible.... what might be easier but still very hard would be to work to a similar system as above, people pick 6/7 (whatever u decide) names, and these 6/7 people have to FT the ME.

    To make it not insanely hard, you don't have to match names with specific MEs so an entry would just be like....

    This week I think TommyD, MattBates, Rancid, Geldy, Jac35, MeWillows and Dohhhhh (lol) will FT a ME.

    Then all 7 of them HAVE to FT one of the MEs that week. Do-able but still very very hard.

    Do I get the first 100k for the idea? ;)


  • chicknMeltchicknMelt Member Posts: 1,159
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    In Response to A poker version of Super6? : Pick 6 tournamets and pick what hand the winner has that wins it i.e. high card/one pair/2 pair/3 of a kind etc etc. One pair might be too popular an answer/result though!
    Posted by jdsallstar
    why not pick the hole cards?
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6? : why not pick the hole cards?
    Posted by chicknMelt
    Cos there's 169 starting hands :p

    Would be a 1in169 shot X 1in169 shot X 1in169 for 6-7 MEs... you got better odds (by a country mile) of winning the lottery lol
  • bbMikebbMike Member Posts: 3,722
    edited November 2013

    Name the 3 cards to appear on the first flop on your table in a given tournament.

    You'd have about a 1/130,000 chance of predicting them all correctly and if that's too much value then getting them all in the right order would approach 1/800,000

  • jdsallstarjdsallstar Member Posts: 1,675
    edited November 2013
    Better yet - cards that make the board of last hand of a main event? 

    Ignoring suits gives odds of over 1/500,000
  • bbMikebbMike Member Posts: 3,722
    edited November 2013
    Odds on getting super 6 right is going to be in the region of 10/1^6 probably more, so upwards of 1m/1 shot
  • jdsallstarjdsallstar Member Posts: 1,675
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    Odds on getting super 6 right is going to be in the region of 10/1^6 probably more, so upwards of 1m/1 shot
    Posted by bbMike
    Add suits to my idea-this would take odds well over the 1million mark!
  • gazza127gazza127 Member Posts: 2,156
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    Better yet - cards that make the board of last hand of a main event?  Ignoring suits gives odds of over 1/500,000
    Posted by jdsallstar

    I imagine a lot less people would enter a poker super 6 rather than a football super 6 so having the odds slightly reduced shouldnt matter too much.  This is why I like this suggestion best at the moment.
  • chicknMeltchicknMelt Member Posts: 1,159
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6? : Cos there's 169 starting hands :p Would be a 1in169 shot X 1in169 shot X 1in169 for 6-7 MEs... you got better odds (by a country mile) of winning the lottery lol
    Posted by Lambert180
    fair point. 
  • a00rocka00rock Member Posts: 832
    edited November 2013
    I like Lamberts idea you could also give points 1-6 for finishing places if you needed tie breakers.
  • alimayalimay Member Posts: 37
    edited November 2013
    names the final table main event sunday and position finished


  • gazza127gazza127 Member Posts: 2,156
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    names the final table main event sunday and position finished
    Posted by alimay
    Yes but for this to work youd need to know whos actually playing which you wont fully know til late registration has closed.

    And by then you'd already have eliminated a load of players.

    Not sure I could see that ever working.
  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited November 2013

    with super 6 we can a lot of the time get 1 result right as their we just picking a number between 7-0 for each team the biggest difficulty is getting all 6 correct

    in each of the main events what about predicting the highest and lowest card to come on the board in the very last hand of them events

    largest card & lowest card Monday 

    largest card & lowest card Tuesday

    largest card & lowest card Wednesday

    largest card & lowest card Thursday

    largest card & lowest card Friday     

    largest card & lowest card  Saturday

    largest card & lowest card sunday

    all can be from the last hand of the main events and the prize is for getting all them corrct

  • GELDYGELDY Member Posts: 5,203
    edited November 2013
    i'm guessing super6 is not just meant to be a lottery - sure for some, but others who understand such things - gazza - can use some skill

    guessing cards is purely random - no skill - like an allin sat - not very poker at all

    so far loving lambie's suggestion - could use total number of cashes over a week as a tie-breaker
  • DTWBANDITDTWBANDIT Member Posts: 6,451
    edited November 2013


       How about each Month pick the Final Table 6 of the Super Roller
  • GlenelgGlenelg Member Posts: 6,621
    edited November 2013
    I like Lamberts idea, HOWEVER, if Sky are putting up £100k they are wanting to attract NON - Sky players?  In fact, NON poker players?   I know a few people who play Super6 who know NOTHING about football! 
     My idea would be to guess the number of players in the main each day of week.  so Mon = 133, Tues= 231 etc (You could have it to the nearest 5 or 10 to increase/decrease the probability?) Tie-breaker = What time does the primo finish?
    Jobs a goodun!
  • XBOOTNECKXBOOTNECK Member Posts: 99
    edited November 2013
    In Response to A poker version of Super6?:
    Hi everyone We're sure many of you are familiar with Super6, the free to play game where you can win £250,000 (up to £1m some weeks!) by predicting scores in the football. In fact a few weeks ago, someone won £250,000 by winning this, all for nothing! So, heres a thought - if there was a poker version of Super6 how would you design it? What would be the format and what would you need to do to win it? It would obviously have to be quite tough to win without being impossible. Think like the Sky Poker Jackpot but a bit tougher (with it being free). Let's assume its free to play and top prize is £100,000. Thanks Sky Poker
    Posted by Sky_Poker
    The colour of each of the final table sixes underwear in each weeks primo, special prize if you guess anyones commando correctly ;o)

    Call it SUPER SKIDS ;o))

  • GlenelgGlenelg Member Posts: 6,621
    edited November 2013
    In Response to Re: A poker version of Super6?:
    In Response to A poker version of Super6? : The colour of each of the final table sixes underwear in each weeks primo, special prize if you guess anyones commando correctly ;o)
    Posted by XBOOTNECK

    Not out long then?  Symptoms WILL pass! Ditch the tablets tho!  Great name, tho in poker I know you WILL TILT! PM me....
     
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,390
    edited November 2013
    Why not have a Super 6 tournie at a certain time each week. (Freeroll  or low stakes to get a big entry)

    People would have to enter by a certain date/time one or two days before the tournament takes place.

    List of entrants then posted on the forum and people would have to select the six players who Final Table before the tournie starts. 

    The tie break could be how many hands played in the tournie.

    Gives two lots of interest, the people who want to play in it and the people who want to guess the result.

    Not a poker expert so dont know if it would work but thought it worth putting forward.

     
Sign In or Register to comment.