I wholeheartedly believe that there is a strong need for a timebank. Having recently moved from 888 where I grinded NL20/30 full ring, the fast-paced nature of the NL10 games here really requires a timebank to think through some of the more difficult decisions, especially on the river. It has already been mentioned that this is the industry standard and I geniunely believe it would attract far more players to the site if they knew they had tank time available. One of my good poker friends from 888 who plays the mid-stakes would like to move to Sky Poker himself but refuses to do so all the time you don't have a timebank! Needless to say the rake you could generate from more like him would surely more than justify its existence?!
On a related but slightly seperate note, I think it is as (if not more) important to have disconnection protection. Not everyone's internet is perfect the whole time, and indeed in a 3-bet pot yesterday I lost internet for the 10 crucial seconds it took the fish to donk-shove the river with 90% of our stacks in the middle already and I held top boat!!! If not network latency timebank allowance, then at least a function that treats disconnected players as all-in already??
My guess is more of you are keen to see these amendments to an otherwise tremendous offering too
Thanks, and I hope you take note of some of these suggestions Sky!
Greg
Comments
As im sure we have all been in the situation where the other table/s have slowed right down trying too wait on someone busting and i think with a timebank this would just be worse especially if say a friend is on the same table or other table knowing that they can try waste time too help you out or speed up while u use the timebank.
Maybe if they could put it on cash games and not tournaments or say in tournaments but only have 30 seconds and this gets reset every break so its 1 an hour.
I would say by the amount of threads on the forum and my own expeirience,s with disconnection that some sort of protection from this would be a great idea.but again this could be abused by players deliberately disconnecting at crucial times in games.
At the moment it's not so easy to input a specified bet amount, and we only have 15 seconds to make a decision. When multi-tabling this can become quite challenging especially if presented with an awkward spot or you are involved in a couple of hands at the same time.
But what about players like myself who play for fun and only play say 2/3 tables at a time,
Are you are saying we have too get our games slowed down too accommodate players who play 6 or however many tables?
That's your,s and others choice too play that amount of tables.
If people can,t handle that many tables with the time they have then play less tables
If people want too try and grind a living out of poker that is fine and good luck too them.
But why should players like me help them take my money quicker by saying we need a timebank when we don,t.
Maybe others do but others don,t.
I know people will disagree but thats just my opinion...
good luck at the tables.
p.s I,m sure there was another thread on this a few month ago as well.which i think was split
The above can be really abused in the bubble of a sattelite. But this should be no reason as to why there should be no time bank. It is something that is needed and also the disconnection protection (Especially HU) as has already been mentioned.
https://www.skypoker.com/secure/poker/sky_lobby?action=show_static&page=poker_community_forums&plckForumPage=ForumDiscussion&plckDiscussionId=Cat%3a57795ac2-1793-4377-b4cf-e124b0f555f4Forum%3adf77f82c-151f-4bea-aae1-fb423dcae1faDiscussion%3a24ce318b-0de5-4d9a-80de-d3017c905088&plckShowLatestPost=1
as for other sites having timebanks go too those sites if you really need a timebank or play less tables and within your limits!