i have just played in a double your money and one player did not play untill he was in the money this is happening offten and it spoils the game can anything be done about it as it is unfair play
i have just played in a double your money and one player did not play untill he was in the money this is happening offten and it spoils the game can anything be done about it as it is unfair play Posted by eagle10
i have just played in a double your money and one player did not play untill he was in the money this is happening offten and it spoils the game can anything be done about it as it is unfair play Posted by eagle10
whilst these people can sit out if they wish, i do think it changes the dynamic of the dym, and is to the advantage of the person sat to the left of a sat out player.
Agree with Mere, Tikay 7 Others on this one. This is not an unfair thing to do. If 3 people managed o get knocked out before the blinds affected this guy too much then that's their bad play, not this guy who hasn't done anything. i know a lot of people who will sit out until bubble and then raise every unopened pot. It's a recognised and reasonable stratagey. This guy just got lucky that he didn't even need to get involved on the bubble
i have just played in a double your money and one player did not play untill he was in the money this is happening offten and it spoils the game can anything be done about it as it is unfair play Posted by eagle10
its simples.....when you get down to the last 4 you blind him out until you all cash,this is not cheating you are entitled to fold, call,or raise with any hand at any time,as long as you dont type it in chat box its ok..
In Response to bad sports : its simples.....when you get down to the last 4 you blind him out until you all cash,this is not cheating you are entitled to fold, call,or raise with any hand at any time,as long as you dont type it in chat box its ok.. Posted by DAVEYZZ
i may of misunderstood i thought you meant he was sat out all game... to fold every hand is diffrerent,nowt wrongb with that
Comments
No player has to play a hand at any point.
It is thier money, they may play as they wish
It's also why I hate them. Most boring games in the world.
Eagle - you can't force anyone to play a hand I'm afraid, & nor should you want to.
If he made the money without playing a single hand, the 3 who went out first must have really mangled it.
I have seen it happen, but usually at micro stakes.
You need to play ultra tight early on in these, if three others get knocked out in the meantime, it's just a bonus.
I would wager I play less than 20% of all starting hands in these games early doors. (unless I am BB with no raises)
One of the most succesful players on the site at these games only ever plays monsters.
Bubble time, and it can be a lottery, especially when the blinds hit 200/400+.
Agree with Mere, Tikay 7 Others on this one. This is not an unfair thing to do. If 3 people managed o get knocked out before the blinds affected this guy too much then that's their bad play, not this guy who hasn't done anything. i know a lot of people who will sit out until bubble and then raise every unopened pot. It's a recognised and reasonable stratagey. This guy just got lucky that he didn't even need to get involved on the bubble
Deckchair racing
Earball
Matchstick fighting
to fold every hand is diffrerent,nowt wrongb with that