Hi pokers and poked ---- Well, we all know how easy it is for a famous and well presented poker expert to host a night of fun and banter --- But--- What if DEFECTORS had never happened? ---- What if the make-up department were on strike!---- and what if Tikay had refused to waste four years of his life explaining how to appear competent? --- eh? -------- eh?
Could any Tom, Richard, or Harry start a show thread and pretend to have his own show on the telly?----
First question for tonights show --- How would you explain, in laymans terms, why Sky poker think it's a good idea to put our Richard Orford in such an awkward position, sat next to an actual poker expert----- and what do they hope to achieve by exposing Richard in such a cruel and callous manner? --
Second question---- can you thnk of a poker question that Richard can easily answer, and yet Stuart would feel awkward and have trouble answering----
The winner gets to post the question to Stuart and give Richard the only opportunity he may ever have of gaining any respect at all in the poker world, ever.
Comments
Your first question. It's obviously been the biggest wind up in TV history having Orford present a poker show. Why has he not twigged yet? There's definitely plenty of footage for a new programme called How To Present A Poker Show For 7 years And Learn Absolutely Nothing
2nd question. Is Stuart Rutter the best analyst ever on Sky Poker? Richard would have a short sharp answer for that and Stuart would be far too modest to sing his own praises.