You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
I played this elsewhere as there was no people playng here at the silly o'clock I was playing, but thought I'd post it here for opinions as I debated it after the session.
I had played 34 hands and had 40 hands of info on all players involved, except for the guy in MP who raise, who I have around 340 hands on. SB is 21/18 with AF of 8, and UTG is real fish with 63/0 and AF of .6.
$0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
MP: $10.23
CO: $12.98
BTN: $21.30
SB: $4.36Hero (BB): $10.00UTG: $10.46SB posts SB $0.05, Hero posts BB $0.10Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero has KhJhSB checks, Hero bets $0.90, UTG calls $0.90, fold, SB raises to $3.96 and is all-in, Hero??
My thoughts were that after it was checked round on the flop and SB being aggresive as **** hadn't lead out on the turn I thought I'd try and take it away and have plenty of outs if I got called by the UTG who is very loose calling station. When UTG calls I'm not too surprised, but caught out a bit when SB shoves leaving me odds of 2.6:1 on a draw thats only 3:1 to hit.
So my question is do I call? UTG has shown he will chase all sorts of draws, even gutshots, and call with most pairs and certainly TP even if with weak kicker. He has been lucky since I've been at table, but his time is limited. I felt if II called there was a fair chance he calls again giving me chance to stack him if I hit. So call or fold to the odds?
Comments
Certainly the guy playing 63% of his hands with 0% raising and playing a loose-passive/passive game is a fish in anyones book. Add in I've noted him calling station on hands he really sholdn't and getting lucky on turns and rivers on two occasions so far.
On the depth of stack, I don't disagree, but I'm not far off even money call on the shove itself, and there is a fair chance that the UTG player will call as well, giving some fair implied odds to teh call. Both of us will still have $5 left after the call as well. Hence why the question. If the UTG was on my right and made the call first it would be a no brainer call on the odds alone.
As to my bet on turn. I don't disagree, but my thoughts were that on the flop we all checked to the raiser and he checked as well. On the turn the guy that had been very aggresive post flop checked again and so I thought I might well take it down there. I thoght the raiser preflop had missed or was light due to him not cbetting. Which isn't a surprise given that cbetting a missed flop against 3 people would not be wise. I could easy rep the ace still given that checking to raiser is fairly standard. So for me I only felt I had to get this semi-bluff past the UTG to take it down here. As it turned out that was wrong, but if I check the turn and and river is a blank I have virtually no chance ot win the hand. So i thought it was worth a short, and it backfired. It happens. Least that was my thougths on it.
Meh might not be optimal at a soft 10nl game. Not sure.
Post flop - If you think UTG is gonna call a decent % of the time then a call is good.
fwiw agree with betting the turn. Sizing is good too.