All Categories› Strategy

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Low Pocket Pairs

peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
edited December 2021 in Strategy
Simple discussion:

Early stages of a DYM (levels 1-2), do you think we should raise pre-flop with low pocket pairs to build the pot for when we hit our set OR conserve chips by just calling (essentially set mining).

Also, does your answer change for levels 3-5?
· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • jimb0d1jimb0d1 Member Posts: 660
    edited March 2014
    Opening I would raise every time, will win some hands and pre and make it easier to win a big pot with your set.  Good players will get suspicious when you limp-call then get super aggro on the flop.
    · Share on Twitter
  • spinky6108spinky6108 Member Posts: 253
    edited March 2014
    Fold em or limp in for me dont need to take any chances at levels 1 or 2 look after your stack!
    · Share on Twitter
  • JockBMWJockBMW Member Posts: 2,653
    edited March 2014
    Jam It  :o) 

    That is the title of my new SNG Strategy Book.

    It  is also the entire content

    I think it'll be a best seller ;o)
    · Share on Twitter
  • Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,491
    edited March 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    Jam It  :o)  That is the title of my new SNG Strategy Book. It  is also the entire content I think it'll be a best seller ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW
    I think I read your book.
    Confirmed, awesome
    · Share on Twitter
  • alex1229alex1229 Member Posts: 680
    edited April 2014
    Never ever limp. Always raising
    · Share on Twitter
  • jdsallstarjdsallstar Member Posts: 1,675
    edited April 2014
    I'll give how I generally play these. There's probably leaks all over it but I'd be happy on feedback on my take on it too. Oh and I am assuming when you say low we're talking 66 and below.

    Level 1 or 2

    Unopened pot

    utg - fold pre.
    middle position - I probably fold pre but if I am confident I can get away with a limp I might occasionally limp em.
    Button - I probably 3 x open.

    Opened pot before you act:

    UTG - N/A

    Middle Position - limp along/flat call a raise. Calling raises here I think is very table and opponent dependant. If opener is uber tight aggressive I prob fold pre. If I think by calling that'll be the end of the action and it's not likely to get raised again I'll flat call. If it's maniac city I probably fold. I want to see a cheap flop.

    Button - limp along / flat 3x raises or below. The more players who have limped/called the better. i.e. If someone opened for 80 utg (level 1) and 2 other players call I'd prob call too for the implied odds.

    Level 3-5

    Unopened

    Utg - fold pre.

    Middle position - about 50/50 whether I raise or fold. Will fold if table is super aggro and more likely to raise if table is uber passive. Type of players in the blind is very important I think here. May limp on the right table.

    Button - raise.

    Opened
    If it has been raised it's prob a fold pre most times for me. Might reshove if I'm short stacked and need to get something to happen to get back into it.

    If I already have a good stack (£3.5k+) at this stage I will prob fold small pockets 95% of the time regardless of position or action before me.

    Overall it also depends how difficult I rate the table. If it's very soft I'm less likely to play the low pp's because I'll be confident that someone will pay me off in a better/easier spot.

    As I said that's my take and it probably has leaks throughout lol


    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited April 2014
    Wow, really didn't expect such a variation in responses! Got to admit this has just made me even more unsure - I guess a big consideration is how the other players at the table are playing though - so there is no one right answer.
    · Share on Twitter
  • JussfoldJussfold Member Posts: 14
    edited April 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    Wow, really didn't expect such a variation in responses! Got to admit this has just made me even more unsure - I guess a big consideration is how the other players at the table are playing though - so there is no one right answer.
    Posted by peter27
    yes, and JD's comment is very close to my view, particularly this bit ref early levels:

    Middle Position - limp along/flat call a raise. Calling raises here I think is very table and opponent dependant. If opener is uber tight aggressive I prob fold pre. If I think by calling that'll be the end of the action and it's not likely to get raised again I'll flat call. If it's maniac city I probably fold. I want to see a cheap flop.


    It is mostly about situation, and even more so up the levels.  FWIW, I'll only play small PP past level 4 if I'm really short, or if table is very passive - there will be better spots to add some chips to your stack.
    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited May 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs : yes, and JD's comment is very close to my view, particularly this bit ref early levels: Middle Position - limp along/flat call a raise. Calling raises here I think is very table and opponent dependant. If opener is uber tight aggressive I prob fold pre. If I think by calling that'll be the end of the action and it's not likely to get raised again I'll flat call. If it's maniac city I probably fold. I want to see a cheap flop. It is mostly about situation, and even more so up the levels.  FWIW, I'll only play small PP past level 4 if I'm really short, or if table is very passive - there will be better spots to add some chips to your stack.
    Posted by Jussfold
    Thanks for that Jussfold, very helpful.

    Sorry for the late response too!
    · Share on Twitter
  • Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,491
    edited May 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    Wow, really didn't expect such a variation in responses! Got to admit this has just made me even more unsure - I guess a big consideration is how the other players at the table are playing though - so there is no one right answer.
    Posted by peter27
    Notes :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,491
    edited May 2014
    Don't play DYM's Peter.

    In the low stake 1s, i guess there is a lot of limping going on? People only raising their big hands, or mostly?

    If there was a lot of limping going, it would be a nice hand to over limp in the earlier levels, hit your set and i could well get paid off quite light.

    A lot of people say "don't limp" but there is times when a limp, or over-limp, can be useful.

    Low pocket pairs in DYM's would fit into this. Raising is fine too imo. Or even folding from earlish position.
    · Share on Twitter
  • acky1985acky1985 Member Posts: 78
    edited May 2014
    raise every time all day every day
    · Share on Twitter
  • JussfoldJussfold Member Posts: 14
    edited May 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs : Notes :)
    Posted by Jac35
    Definitely!
    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited May 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    Don't play DYM's Peter. In the low stake 1s, i guess there is a lot of limping going on? People only raising their big hands, or mostly? If there was a lot of limping going, it would be a nice hand to over limp in the earlier levels, hit your set and i could well get paid off quite light. A lot of people say "don't limp" but there is times when a limp, or over-limp, can be useful. Low pocket pairs in DYM's would fit into this. Raising is fine too imo. Or even folding from earlish position.
    Posted by LARSON7
    Agree completely with your analysis, but not sure what the first line was about - seemed a bit random? "Don't play DYM's Peter" - why?? :/
    · Share on Twitter
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,491
    edited May 2014

    * I don't play DYM's :)

    · Share on Twitter
  • mrsduckmrsduck Member Posts: 1,901
    edited May 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    * I don't play DYM's :)
    Posted by LARSON7
    Lol, I also thought...oooh Larson's being a bit rude there! ;)
    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited May 2014
    Ahh, that makes more sense! Haha :D
    · Share on Twitter
  • TeddyBloatTeddyBloat Member Posts: 1,419
    edited June 2014
    Id much rather call a raise with 22-55 against a tight aggro  player than a loose one. In fact if I knew my oppo had a range of TT-AA id be more likey to play 33 than if I knew he had a range of 'any 2 gapped connctor and all pairs'

    We are playing for set value and much of our implied odds come from holding a very disguised monster when our oppoment has an over pair/ top pair / two pair. 

    A tight player will hit flops harder than a loose one, we often wont get paid on a 39A board with 33 againt a loose player who is as likely to have 58o as AK and we will likely get barrelled off the best hand when we  both miss. but against someone who is only raising the top 20% of hands we will run into a hand that will pay us off quite nicely more often and we can make more confident laydowns when we miss.

    A very passive player is agood player to enter a pot with aslo, as they will allow us to see turns and rivers giving us more chance of hitting a set or even realising our equity when they check down king or ace high.



    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited July 2014
    In Response to Re: Low Pocket Pairs:
    Id much rather call a raise with 22-55 against a tight aggro  player than a loose one. In fact if I knew my oppo had a range of TT-AA id be more likey to play 33 than if I knew he had a range of 'any 2 gapped connctor and all pairs' We are playing for set value and much of our implied odds come from holding a very disguised monster when our oppoment has an over pair/ top pair / two pair.  A tight player will hit flops harder than a loose one, we often wont get paid on a 39A board with 33 againt a loose player who is as likely to have 58o as AK and we will likely get barrelled off the best hand when we  both miss. but against someone who is only raising the top 20% of hands we will run into a hand that will pay us off quite nicely more often and we can make more confident laydowns when we miss. A very passive player is agood player to enter a pot with aslo, as they will allow us to see turns and rivers giving us more chance of hitting a set or even realising our equity when they check down king or ace high.
    Posted by TeddyBloat
    This is a very helpful post, thanks a lot Teddy :-)
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.