In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : No, because that's TWO people being mischievious in the same thread. The Forum Rules state one mischief-maker per thread is max. If you want a serious answer (& you deserve one), I don't know. As to SPT's & the like, yes, we know many of you are frustrated at the delay in news, but that's not deliberate, & everyone will know the score soon enough. On the surface, it may seem that nothing is happening as to Live Events. Under the surface, the little duck's legs are paddling furiously. Posted by Tikay10
OP is attention seeker. How is it best to deal with an attention seeker? A - to ignore them. I clicked ignore on Nutty a good while ago and have refused to re-comment on a thread of his since then. But I'm going to have to break that to tell everyone to just do exactly as I have done - and just don't even bother to open a thread started by him! hhyftrftdr and Jac in particular I implore you both to just bite your tongue and move on :P
If everyone eventually ignored any threads he created, he would get bored and finally give up posting. (hurrah)
OP is attention seeker. How is it best to deal with an attention seeker? A - to ignore them. I clicked ignore on Nutty a good while ago and have refused to re-comment on a thread of his since then. But I'm going to have to break that to tell everyone to just do exactly as I have done - and just don't even bother to open a thread started by him! hhyftrftdr and Jac in particular I implore you both to just bite your tongue and move on :P If everyone eventually ignored any threads he created, he would get bored and finally give up posting. (hurrah) Posted by F_Ivanovic
Good Post by Mr Ivan, & generally, I do the same thing.
But there are some very gullible folks around, & some things have to be clearly refuted, such as....
"...I know Sky was trying to get some big names on board from the pro circuit and failed as Pokerstars trumped them...."
And Mr OP cannot "KNOW" that, because it is utterly untrue, there is not a scintilla, jot, tickle or iota of truth in that.
One might say - note how wonderfully diplomatic the thread is - he is discombobulating with dissimulations.
OP is attention seeker. How is it best to deal with an attention seeker? A - to ignore them. I clicked ignore on Nutty a good while ago and have refused to re-comment on a thread of his since then. But I'm going to have to break that to tell everyone to just do exactly as I have done - and just don't even bother to open a thread started by him! hhyftrftdr and Jac in particular I implore you both to just bite your tongue and move on :P If everyone eventually ignored any threads he created, he would get bored and finally give up posting. (hurrah) Posted by F_Ivanovic
In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : Diplomacy Rules, twice in the same thread. PS - Congrats on your Cash in last night's Mega Roller. Only a min-cash, but it all helps. Legend . Posted by Tikay10
Thanks for the rub mr k! I finished a couple off the
In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : Thanks for the rub mr k! I finished a couple off the Money! Posted by MattBates
Noooooo?
Surely not?
My bad.
Could have sworn you cashed, you had chips when I last looked.
PS - OK, I knew. Worked a treat though. I enjoyed that. I did.
In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : No, because that's TWO people being mischievious in the same thread. The Forum Rules state one mischief-maker per thread is the max. If you want a serious answer (& you deserve one), I don't know. As to SPT's & the like, yes, we know many of you are frustrated at the delay in news, but that's not deliberate, & everyone will know the score soon enough. On the surface, it may seem that nothing is happening as to Live Events. Under the surface, the little duck's legs are paddling furiously. Posted by Tikay10
Tuesday night, bust out first hand, then drive home again, when we can play online in our bra & panties, & enter another MTT the moment we bust out . Had to laugh at this Teeks, playing PLO8 dyms v you will never be the same with that image in mind. Posted by pomfrittes[/QUOTE You swine you beat me too it. Any Photoshop experts about?
In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? :
Tuesday night, bust out first hand, then drive home again, when we can play online in our bra & panties , & enter another MTT the moment we bust out . Had to laugh at this Teeks, playing PLO8 dyms v you will never be the same with that image in mind. Posted by pomfrittes[/QUOTE You swine you beat me too it. Any Photoshop experts about? Posted by FlyingDagg
Sorry FD, mind you that image is better than the 1 i used to have, Y-fronts and string vest.
As to SPT's & the like, yes, we know many of you are frustrated at the delay in news, but that's not deliberate, & everyone will know the score soon enough. On the surface, it may seem that nothing is happening as to Live Events. Under the surface, the little duck's legs are paddling furiously. Posted by Tikay10
THIS IS GREAT NEWS.
Admittedly i hate waiting, but this defo means theres another spt, im off to party. Im sure if their as fantastic as they always have been then the trend of smashing guarentees will continue
In Response to No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : Methinks you are being mischievious (again....) Mr Nuggy. There is no lack of interest in SPT's, every single one, ever, beat it's Guarantee. There is no connection or correlation between 'Stars & SPT's Live Events, none whatsoever. Sky were trying to get some "big names" on board from the Pro circuit ? No they were not. None, zilch, nada. 'Stars stole a beloved (Sky Poker) Present er. Mr James Hartigan? James worked for 'Stars BEFORE & throughout his time with Sky Poker. Sky Poker were privileged to have him, but his main employer was always 'Stars. Sky Poker is "loosing" market share v Pokerstars ? No it is not. 'Stars is a zillion times bigger, & deservedly, it serves the entire world. But it is not gaining market share from Sky Poker. No Live Events? The Sky Poker UKPC was a stnning success, by any yardstick, & was universally acclaimed by players, Media, & industry alike. Sky Poker will announce any future plans it has for Live Poker in due course. EPT Satellites? Why on earth would Sky Poker ever want to run satellites to the EPT? It would be commercial lunacy. In any case, Stars would not permit it, even if Sky Poker wanted to. And they don't. Live poker is the best? Well on that, we agree, yes, Live Poker is the greatest. But it's nothing like as convenient as Online Poker, the vast majority of us have to get up for work in the morning, don't want to travel to a Tourney on a wet Tuesday night, bust out first hand, then drive home again, when we can play online in our bra & panties, & enter another MTT the moment we bust out. Whatever Online Site we choose to play on - & there is huge choice - we can & do play as & when we want, we don't have to make an excuse to the other half, & leave him/her to put the baby to bed. So yeah, Live Poker is great, & most of us adore it, but the reality is, Online is the format of choice for it's sheer convenience & choice. Which explains why Online Poker Trafic is 1,000's of times bigger than Live Poker. Every night of the year. Posted by Tikay10
In Response to Re: No SPT's Scheduled - Superroller struggling - End near? : THIS IS GREAT NEWS. Admittedly i hate waiting, but this defo means theres another spt, im off to party. Im sure if their as fantastic as they always have been then the trend of smashing guarentees will continue Posted by The_Don90
Comments
PS - Congrats on your Cash in last night's Mega Roller. Only a min-cash, but it all helps. Legend.
Ha!
Now you know......
Stoke City won again, too. Happy days.
But there are some very gullible folks around, & some things have to be clearly refuted, such as....
"...I know Sky was trying to get some big names on board from the pro circuit and failed as Pokerstars trumped them...."
And Mr OP cannot "KNOW" that, because it is utterly untrue, there is not a scintilla, jot, tickle or iota of truth in that.
One might say - note how wonderfully diplomatic the thread is - he is discombobulating with dissimulations.
Ooohhhhhhhhh
Surely not?
My bad.
Could have sworn you cashed, you had chips when I last looked.
PS - OK, I knew. Worked a treat though. I enjoyed that. I did.
I've seen pictures on at least half a dozen websites already, of an in flagrante Tikay.
THIS IS GREAT NEWS.
New balls please.
The poor old duck RIP
(look what you have started now Tikay)
but your obfuscation deserves it
not that you have any choice I know.