He makes the point that the cards are not random in his view.
Many of the negative comments made on this forum relate to the efficiency of the sites operating systems - it would be reassuring to have an informed view on the current performance levels of these systems.
For example: the site states that in 2009 the RNG was audited and found to be completely fair, random and unpredictable. Had I been playing on this site in 2009 I would have found such information encouraging. However, we are now in 2014 and a 5 year old audit result is of little value.
I would assume that the site regulator AGCC requires regular compliance testing as part of its licensing conditions - in an attempt to reassure a number of concerned customers perhaps Sky could update its RNG audit information.
What are the good points made out of interest? He makes the point that the cards are not random in his view. Many of the negative comments made on this forum relate to the efficiency of the sites operating systems - it would be reassuring to have an informed view on the current performance levels of these systems. For example: the site states that in 2009 the RNG was audited and found to be completely fair, random and unpredictable. Had I been playing on this site in 2009 I would have found such information encouraging. However, we are now in 2014 and a 5 year old audit result is of little value. I would assume that the site regulator AGCC requires regular compliance testing as part of its licensing conditions - in an attempt to reassure a number of concerned customers perhaps Sky could update its RNG audit information. Posted by somer
And what has he put forward to support this view?
He says all sites are rigged to some degree (or words to that effect), so I assume one audited in 2014 would still be doing the dirty in his eyes....
I don't see any concerned players. Just a bunch of people who would prefer to blame a site for their poker deficiencies than looking at their own game with a critical eye. Easier that way eh?
In Response to Re: How to improve 100% : And what has he put forward to support this view? He says all sites are rigged to some degree (or words to that effect), so I assume one audited in 2014 would still be doing the dirty in his eyes.... I don't see any concerned players. Just a bunch of people who would prefer to blame a site for their poker deficiencies than looking at their own game with a critical eye. Easier that way eh? Posted by hhyftrftdr
Harry knows full well that every time you defend Sky from the doubters on these forums you get a 1% boost in winning your flips ;-) This improvement only lasts for a month tho and is far better obv than the -2% for the negative comments which have a 6 month time span :-(
Don't play on this manually programmed software, there is absolutely nothing RANDOM about the cards on this site or any other site. They use blocks of cards that generate play. In cash games this creates more rake for SKY. In comps the software allocates each player a rating and the cards will be allocated to favour the better rated player, this is why you often see big stacks calling with bad hands and always winning. Try out what I am saying, you will very quickly see the players at your table who have better or worse ratings and then apply this knowledge. GL Posted by 1MINDMAN
I have on good authority that this is very true, i believe each persons rating is assigned in direct corelation to the size of their manhood, so you are making a very valid point
What are the good points made out of interest? He makes the point that the cards are not random in his view. Many of the negative comments made on this forum relate to the efficiency of the sites operating systems - it would be reassuring to have an informed view on the current performance levels of these systems. For example: the site states that in 2009 the RNG was audited and found to be completely fair, random and unpredictable. Had I been playing on this site in 2009 I would have found such information encouraging. However, we are now in 2014 and a 5 year old audit result is of little value. I would assume that the site regulator AGCC requires regular compliance testing as part of its licensing conditions - in an attempt to reassure a number of concerned customers perhaps Sky could update its RNG audit information. Posted by somer
seriously is this true I dunno much about this site so I don't want to comment but I do love the games! but if this is true sky got some questions to answer. I hope its not because I find this site very enjoyable
Oh dear Natry, you're dangerously close to becoming one of 'them'. Careful. Posted by hhyftrftdr
Im not backing anyone im keeping myself to myself but how havent it been audited recently? Im nt saying its dodgy but sky seem quiet about it and 5 years since last audit seems pretty long. Personally i dunno whether its rigged or random but these questions should be answered by sky. I also think this is the best poker site out there
In Response to Re: How to improve 100% : Im not backing anyone im keeping myself to myself but how havent it been audited recently? Im nt saying its dodgy but sky seem quiet about it and 5 years since last audit seems pretty long. Personally i dunno whether its rigged or random but these questions should be answered by sky. I also think this is the best poker site out there Posted by natry20111
This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill-the story ends,you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill-you stay in wonderland and i show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.
In Response to Re: How to improve 100% : Im not backing anyone im keeping myself to myself but how havent it been audited recently? Im nt saying its dodgy but sky seem quiet about it and 5 years since last audit seems pretty long. Personally i dunno whether its rigged or random but these questions should be answered by sky. I also think this is the best poker site out there Posted by natry20111
Tikay said somewhere that it is audited/checked every year
Comments
He says all sites are rigged to some degree (or words to that effect), so I assume one audited in 2014 would still be doing the dirty in his eyes....
I don't see any concerned players. Just a bunch of people who would prefer to blame a site for their poker deficiencies than looking at their own game with a critical eye. Easier that way eh?
I'll take any answer from you with a bag of salt.
but if this is true sky got some questions to answer.
I hope its not because I find this site very enjoyable
Careful.
Why do you play here if you think the site is dodgy?
Regards, hhyftrftdr