In Response to Re: Can the RNG on all sites be programmed within a range of settings? : i'm loving it - wish i had followed all the moves Posted by GELDY
I'm surprised the mods haven't rumbled up and moved it because it ain't poker chat...
Aye--- people don't seem to realise---- if a poker site wants to steal your money, they would over-ride the RNG and choose their own cards, choose your cards, choose the flop,turn and river.
Imo, many people know there are gangsters running poker sites, and they play on Skypoker because they trust that this site is run properly and legally.
Personally, I think Tikay's presence here reinforces our trust.--- Most beginners go through a phase of doubt when they suffer a series of bad beats that seem extremely unlikely---- if we google "is online poker rigged" , we get thousands of pages saying it is rigged.
I have found a site that rigged games---- gangsters can do what they like online, and they have your address, photo id and bank details.
Be careful out there!---- play on a site that is easy to trust !
Nice one Machka!--- was great fun!--- thread in the rail if you fancy a game --- not played much since my youth, but like a good game---- or a random one -- lol
In Response to Re: Can the RNG on all sites be programmed within a range of settings? : Ha! Well done Mike. Ask a question on a poker forum, & all you have to do then is select the answer you think is right. I'm prefrctly happy with the reply I gave. In all the history of Online Poker, & all the various dodges we have seen elsewhere (Absolute etc), there has never been a case of a dodgy RNG. I doubt there ever will be, either - every crime has to have a motice, & no site would ever benefit from doing it. CAN it be done? Yes, of course. WOULD it? No way. Be the most ridiculous thing ever as the site would not benefit. PS - Good result at the weekend v QPR, well done. Posted by Tikay10
Tony
The purpose of posting a range of the replies (without any comment) was to show a number of things:
1: There are conflicting views by respected posters.
2: Especially for hhyft....maybe not such a silly Q?
Please note that at no stage in this debate have I gave my opinion and there is a very simple reason for that - I don't have one - because I don't understand RNG's. I am very much of the view that if you don't know what you are talking about, say nothing other than to seek knowledge. As such, I am thankful for all the replies.
As for the result against QPR - papering over the cracks at the moment. But we are a better side than how we are playing just now.
Ok-- nice one--- I will have a few bob to deposit tomorrow, so will be in a good mood for around 40 minutes!--- that's good innit!! I know how slippery you are now too!---- no board--- queen on wrong square--lol-- I got two boards, so Geldy can play too if he likes. Posted by oynutter
In Response to Re: Can the RNG on all sites be programmed within a range of settings? : oooh that would be fun havent played for decades though other than vs my kids Posted by GELDY
Hiya Geldy, there's a thread on the rail if you fancy a game---you up all night?--lol
In Response to Re: Can the RNG on all sites be programmed within a range of settings? : Tony The purpose of posting a range of the replies (without any comment) was to show a number of things: 1: There are conflicting views by respected posters. 2: Especially for hhyft....maybe not such a silly Q? Please note that at no stage in this debate have I gave my opinion and there is a very simple reason for that - I don't have one - because I don't understand RNG's. I am very much of the view that if you don't know what you are talking about, say nothing other than to seek knowledge. As such, I am thankful for all the replies. As for the result against QPR - papering over the cracks at the moment. But we are a better side than how we are playing just now. Posted by Maggiesdad
People are asking/talking about tampering with the RNG in some way. This then wouldn't make it an RNG.
Comments
RESIGNS
I know how slippery you are now too!---- no board--- queen on wrong square--lol--
I got two boards, so Geldy can play too if he likes.
Imo, many people know there are gangsters running poker sites, and they play on Skypoker because they trust that this site is run properly and legally.
Personally, I think Tikay's presence here reinforces our trust.--- Most beginners go through a phase of doubt when they suffer a series of bad beats that seem extremely unlikely---- if we google "is online poker rigged" , we get thousands of pages saying it is rigged.
I have found a site that rigged games---- gangsters can do what they like online, and they have your address, photo id and bank details.
Be careful out there!---- play on a site that is easy to trust !
http://www.chess.com/analysis-board-editor?diagram_id=2251848
The purpose of posting a range of the replies (without any comment) was to show a number of things:
1: There are conflicting views by respected posters.
2: Especially for hhyft....maybe not such a silly Q?
Please note that at no stage in this debate have I gave my opinion and there is a very simple reason for that - I don't have one - because I don't understand RNG's. I am very much of the view that if you don't know what you are talking about, say nothing other than to seek knowledge. As such, I am thankful for all the replies.
As for the result against QPR - papering over the cracks at the moment. But we are a better side than how we are playing just now.
Clue is in the name. Its still a silly question.