Don't play 10+ tables then... I agree a time bank would be useful in some situations but not if it's solely to help you play more tables. It's been discussed to the death and AFAIK sky haven't given a legitimate reason as to why there isn't one so my guess would be it's simply not top of their priority and it would take some coding to implement. Some people have gave some reasons like "Rec players will get annoyed" - which aren't valid reasons since:
a) Sky could have fast tables (as they are now, maybe even quicker) - for rec's that only want to 1/2 table at most.
b) Time bank could be made in a way such as to give added time to those that are usually quick with their decisions (hence time taken per hand shouldn't change at all - at least not noticeably.
Don't play 10+ tables then... I agree a time bank would be useful in some situations but not if it's solely to help you play more tables. It's been discussed to the death and AFAIK sky haven't given a legitimate reason as to why there isn't one so my guess would be it's simply not top of their priority and it would take some coding to implement. Some people have gave some reasons like "Rec players will get annoyed" - which aren't valid reasons since: a) Sky could have fast tables (as they are now, maybe even quicker) - for rec's that only want to 1/2 table at most. b) Time bank could be made in a way such as to give added time to those that are usually quick with their decisions (hence time taken per hand shouldn't change at all - at least not noticeably. Posted by F_Ivanovic
Indeed, I hate these sorts of posts moaning about things when actually they are one of the reasons that keep recs on the site. It is nothing short of pure selfishness. Imagine how a rec would feel when a ten tabler religiously uses the time bank if it was ever offered on sky. Not even a debate imo.
Comments
a) Sky could have fast tables (as they are now, maybe even quicker) - for rec's that only want to 1/2 table at most.