You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Few questions to you guys

13»

Comments

  • Darkangel7Darkangel7 Member Posts: 2,585
    edited May 2015
    Where is your PROOF! You said you've done research so what research was it and also as i said where is the proof of your findings? DYM is a total different kettle of fish so why bring that up??
  • HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,202
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Just dodging the question as always, I'm pretty sure if sky/tikay came out and openly said they were cheated you guys out of money you would still defend them
    Posted by kebawo
    I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but......

    You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-))

    I would certainly not defend them.

  • HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,202
    edited May 2015
    well played you found the edit button.
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,594
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them.
    Posted by HENDRIK62
    Hey! That's my job.

    But you've got a point there, Jimi.
  • mrsduckmrsduck Member Posts: 1,901
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them.
    Posted by HENDRIK62
    Nothing wrong with a ducks bottom! :)
  • Sky_DanSky_Dan Member Posts: 589
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo
    We do not take the length of time players have been registered/how many posts they have made on the forum into consideration when banning players from the site. If you are deemed to have been colluding with other players and we are confident you have done so then yes, we will most likely suspend your account indefinitely.

    However not all cases are black & white. Seeing someone fold Aces to another player preflop or not calling an extra 100 chips into a pot of 5000 when they hold a strong hand, okay, that's easy to spot. But sometimes people make genuine mistakes, misclicks, get disconnected etc.
  • HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,202
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo

    There was a recent incident where collusion was reported, investigated and dealt with. The incident you refer to was also reported, investigated and dealt with.

    What more can the operator actually do?
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,594
    edited May 2015
    So, you're not thinking of joining Sky Poker at all... it's just a (very) thinly velied dig at a couple of bad eggs in a pretty large basket.

    Correct?
  • BigBlusterBigBluster Member Posts: 1,075
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo

    What I do find annoying is that you made an original post that many people on here replied to in good faith. You then went on to abuse this good faith and peddle a different message.

  • shakinacesshakinaces Member Posts: 1,590
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo
    He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site...

    It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves.

    I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing.  Right?
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,594
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site... It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves. I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing.  Right?
    Posted by shakinaces
    I am almost positive I detect sarcasm here.

    Right?
  • NoCarbDietNoCarbDiet Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo
    OOOOH - HE SAID BOOBIES!........ (ish)    :D
  • shakinacesshakinaces Member Posts: 1,590
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I am almost positive I detect sarcasm here. Right?
    Posted by Slipwater
    Hi Slip - without doubt sir, you have the greatest shirt collection of any poster on this forum.

    Sorry, what was your question again?
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,594
    edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Hi Slip - without doubt sir, you have the greatest shirt collection of any poster on this forum. Sorry, what was your question again?
    Posted by shakinaces
    My mistake.

    None whatsoever.
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,831
    edited May 2015
    sky have their rng checked every year so i heard,they just dont update the info on the site
Sign In or Register to comment.