Where is your PROOF! You said you've done research so what research was it and also as i said where is the proof of your findings? DYM is a total different kettle of fish so why bring that up??
In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Just dodging the question as always, I'm pretty sure if sky/tikay came out and openly said they were cheated you guys out of money you would still defend them Posted by kebawo
I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but......
You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-))
In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them. Posted by HENDRIK62
In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them. Posted by HENDRIK62
The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt?? Posted by kebawo
There was a recent incident where collusion was reported, investigated and dealt with. The incident you refer to was also reported, investigated and dealt with.
Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today Posted by kebawo
We do not take the length of time players have been registered/how many posts they have made on the forum into consideration when banning players from the site. If you are deemed to have been colluding with other players and we are confident you have done so then yes, we will most likely suspend your account indefinitely.
However not all cases are black & white. Seeing someone fold Aces to another player preflop or not calling an extra 100 chips into a pot of 5000 when they hold a strong hand, okay, that's easy to spot. But sometimes people make genuine mistakes, misclicks, get disconnected etc.
I can assure you that we are improving the way in which we monitor collusion and are focused on a number of specific areas (that I won't go into) over the coming months.
The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt?? Posted by kebawo
What I do find annoying is that you made an original post that many people on here replied to in good faith. You then went on to abuse this good faith and peddle a different message.
The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt?? Posted by kebawo
He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site...
It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves.
I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing. Right?
In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site... It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves. I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing. Right? Posted by shakinaces
Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today Posted by kebawo
In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Hi Slip - without doubt sir, you have the greatest shirt collection of any poster on this forum. Sorry, what was your question again? Posted by shakinaces
Comments
It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves.
I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing. Right?
Sorry, what was your question again?