You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Anonymous?

2»

Comments

  • shakinacesshakinaces Member Posts: 1,590
    edited June 2015
    Already been nailed in respect to the 6-max games... only really needed to remove impact of HUDs.

    The inclusion of chat on the mini-view is still a relatively new addition and helps improve the social/fun aspect of the game which is surely a big win for recs... I enjoy the games way more since this was brought in... Playing anon players in silence would be a big step backwards IMO.
  • tomgooduntomgoodun Member Posts: 3,757
    edited June 2015
    Hi Churchy, always good to see you and have a chat at the tables, and I fully appreciate folk having different points of view,I have a certain weakness that grates my teeth though-the over use of exclamation marks,it comes across as a bit shouty.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,666
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    Hi Churchy, always good to see you and have a chat at the tables, and I fully appreciate folk having different points of view,I have a certain weakness that grates my teeth though-the over use of exclamation marks,it comes across as a bit shouty.
    Posted by tomgoodun
    We are of one mind there, Tom.

    I could post over 100 links explaining why, but here's just one.....

    http://www.tomthumb.org/exclamationmarks.shtml

    You won't find many, if any, in my Posts or Blogs.

    I can't even bring myself to open those threads which start with a Thread Title containing multi-exclamation marks.
     
    I saw a Post yesterday which had 5 sentences & 5 exclamation marks. Which kinda misses the whole point of why we should use them, & how often. If you use one per sentence, how are you ever going to use emphasis when needed? Use two, or three instead?

    I don't know what they teach in schools these days, but it's clearly not punctuation.
     
    Meh, now you've set me off. 
     
  • FCHDFCHD Member Posts: 3,178
    edited June 2015
    I'm with you Tikay, although I did have to write a report once that had about two dozen exclamation marks in it. The defence is that it was about street addresses in Westward Ho!

    One per paragraph should be an absolute maximum, but then kids these days don't know about paragraphs, do they? If it goes over 140 characters they're stuffed.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,666
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    I'm with you Tikay, although I did have to write a report once that had about two dozen exclamation marks in it. The defence is that it was about street addresses in Westward Ho! One per paragraph should be an absolute maximum, but then kids these days don't know about paragraphs, do they? If it goes over 140 characters they're stuffed.
    Posted by FCHD
    Ooh, well done Barny, I'm glad it's not just me.

    As a general rule, one "!" per 1,000 words seems about right. They DO have a useful function, but overusing them destroys their function completely. 

    "Baked Beans 10p per tin!" is just horrible. If 10p is a good price, & your intended audience are grown ups, no exclamation mark is needed. We, the readers, are not stupid.  
  • waller02waller02 Member Posts: 9,111
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    I'm with you Tikay, although I did have to write a report once that had about two dozen exclamation marks in it. The defence is that it was about street addresses in Westward Ho! One per paragraph should be an absolute maximum, but then kids these days don't know about paragraphs, do they? If it goes over 140 characters they're stuffed.
    Posted by FCHD
    Statisically, the average IQ has risen by 30 points in the past 100 years, so the kids are getting smarter ;)
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? : Statisically, the average IQ has risen by 30 points in the past 100 years, so the kids are getting smarter ;)
    Posted by waller02
    What went wrong with you then?
  • waller02waller02 Member Posts: 9,111
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? : What went wrong with you then?
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    Wp
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,666
    edited June 2015

    Apologies for the derail. I blame tomgoodun.
  • NoseyBonkNoseyBonk Member Posts: 6,185
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? : Ooh, well done Barny, I'm glad it's not just me. As a general rule, one "!" per 1,000 words seems about right. They DO have a useful function, but overusing them destroys their function completely.  "Baked Beans 10p per tin!" is just horrible. If 10p is a good price, & your intended audience are grown ups, no exclamation mark is needed. We, the readers, are not stupid.  
    Posted by Tikay10
    Where from!!!!???????????

  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,666
    edited June 2015


    Never mind "Westward Ho!", how bad is this?


    https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yahoo!

    Ugh.
  • VespaPXVespaPX Member Posts: 12,485
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? : Ooh, well done Barny, I'm glad it's not just me. As a general rule, one "!" per 1,000 words seems about right. They DO have a useful function, but overusing them destroys their function completely.  "Baked Beans 10p per tin!" is just horrible. If 10p is a good price, & your intended audience are grown ups, no exclamation mark is needed. We, the readers, are not stupid.  
    Posted by Tikay10
    Just appeared in the chat box

  • tomgooduntomgoodun Member Posts: 3,757
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    Apologies for the derail. I blame tomgoodun.
    Posted by Tikay10[/QUOTE
    :) Oh how I have missed being blamed for stuff, I was beginning to think I am faultless- as a wise man once said "no ones inflammable ";) 







    I know the proper word- just made me chuckle when it was said to me.
  • FCHDFCHD Member Posts: 3,178
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    Never mind "Westward Ho!", how bad is this? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yahoo ! Ugh.
    Posted by Tikay10

    And to bring it back to poker (boring I know), one of the founders of Yahoo shares his name with a former WSOP ME winner.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,666
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? : And to bring it back to poker (boring I know), one of the founders of Yahoo shares his name with a former WSOP ME winner.
    Posted by FCHD
    Jerryyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
  • ajmiltonajmilton Member Posts: 1,458
    edited June 2015
    In Response to Re: Anonymous?:
    In Response to Re: Anonymous? :
    Apologies for the derail. I blame tomgoodun. Posted by Tikay10[/QUOTE :) Oh how I have missed being blamed for stuff, I was beginning to think I am faultless- as a wise man once said "no ones inflammable ";)  I know the proper word- just made me chuckle when it was said to me.
    Posted by tomgoodun
    I like that Tom.
    Or you could use..as the champ once said
    "I'm not perfect, I'm  just the best there is"

    Regards Alan (plo8 oh you know's it champ)
Sign In or Register to comment.