Sorry what do you mean the holiday might of been ok when you were younger ? What has age got to do with it? I am not young and I am retired, also not quite the 85 TiKay claims I am (I'll get my own back you see if if I don't) > my health is not great I am on oxygen I need special medical insurance when travelling, I have to be carted around airports in a wheelchair. I won a package last year, was I pleased? YES!! did I go ? YES? and did I enjoy it ? Oh YES ! Go out and enjoy yourself you are never too old, just look at Tikay and he's had a telegram from the queen (I told you I would). There winge over, on a more serious note if you do win and can go I recommend you do it, It's a great experience.
In Response to Re: Punta Cana Fury : Ha. In Tony Blackburn Radio 1 "Top of the Pots" style...... Unchanged this week at #5, "it's rigged" Steady this week at # 4, Sort it out Sky" Slipping down to 3rd this week, it's any thread title which includes 17 exclamation marks. Down one place at 2, that hardy old chart-topper "fiasco". And straight in at #1, only released days ago, this week's number one is FREEROLL FURY" Posted by Tikay10
I have radio 2 on at work and he still does a show with hits from this year in .....
Whilst reading your post I slipped into that unique drawl which is his style, wp.
In Response to Re: Punta Cana Fury : Ha. In Tony Blackburn Radio 1 "Top of the Pots" style...... Unchanged this week at #5, "it's rigged" Steady this week at # 4, Sort it out Sky" Slipping down to 3rd this week, it's any thread title which includes 17 exclamation marks. Down one place at 2, that hardy old chart-topper "fiasco". And straight in at #1, only released days ago, this week's number one is FREEROLL FURY" Posted by Tikay10
Think Sky is on some mission with me first they stiff me with the Punta Cana. Now they sh*ft me on my bet I had, I did a db and took sp on one of my picks, was happy to come back home to find they both went in, only to find when I log into Sky Bet that they short changed me, so look at settled bets, says a 50% Dead Heat deduction had been imposed, check the distances no dead heats.
Apparently Sky got some rule that am suppose to know about after I have read there T&C's in minute detail, that if you pick a unnamed favourite and it goes off joint fav that entitles them if it comes in to STEAL your money. Why cant they have some pop that when you click on it, it tells you that if it goes off joint, that a 50% deduction will be taken, instead of being snide. I have took sp on loads of other sites when betting, and this has never happened to me before, so wont be using you ever again now.
Sky Poker did nothing wrong in the Punta Cana matter, nothing wrong at all. It was all clearly covered in the T & C's.
"Unnamed joint favourites". If there are 2 - or 3, or even 4 JF's - you can't expect the Bookmaker to pay them all as winners, betting does not - & has never - worked like that. That rule has been in place with every bookmaker for the last 50 years or more to my certain knowledge.
If you had NAMED the horse, instead of "JF", you would have been paid in full.
Sorry you feel that is unfair, but it's not, it's Industry Standard practice.
I do not appear to have received the free bets for the 2 wins the Toffees had. If they can be found (and it might be my error), could someone have a bet with them if possible and give any winnings to charity, please
Some people's glasses are half empty. I do not appear to have received the free bets for the 2 wins the Toffees had. If they can be found (and it might be my error), could someone have a bet with them if possible and give any winnings to charity, please Posted by Essexphil
The free bets in this promo were only valid for one week so I expect you were awarded them but didnt notice. Toffees won wks 5 and 7.
In Response to Re: Punta Cana Fury : The free bets in this promo were only valid for one week so I expect you were awarded them but didnt notice. Toffees won wks 5 and 7. Posted by Phantom66
Fair enough, though couldn't find them at the time.
Hi, Sky Poker did nothing wrong in the Punta Cana matter, nothing wrong at all. It was all clearly covered in the T & C's. "Unnamed joint favourites". If there are 2 - or 3, or even 4 JF's - you can't expect the Bookmaker to pay them all as winners, betting does not - & has never - worked like that. That rule has been in place with every bookmaker for the last 50 years or more to my certain knowledge. If you had NAMED the horse, instead of "JF", you would have been paid in full. Sorry you feel that is unfair, but it's not, it's Industry Standard practice. Posted by Tikay10
Yeh your right mate, sorry for the RAGE. I spoke with Bet365 earlier and they said the same, its been awhile since I did betting and I use to always bet sp favourite, and dont remember it ever happening to me before, maybe I was just lucky and it was favouritism switching horses.
Apologies for being an a*se clown, am letting my frustration with my inability to pull the trigger on loads of winners get the better of me.
In Response to Re: Punta Cana Fury : Yeh your right mate, sorry for the RAGE. I spoke with Bet365 earlier and they said the same, its been awhile since I did betting and I use to always bet sp favourite, and dont remember it ever happening to me before, maybe I was just lucky and it was favouritism switching horses. Apologies for being an a*se clown, am letting my frustration with my inability to pull the trigger on loads of winners get the better of me. Posted by HaveaA1Day
No worries bud, and congrats on the winner anyway.
Comments
Whilst reading your post I slipped into that unique drawl which is his style, wp.
Apparently Sky got some rule that am suppose to know about after I have read there T&C's in minute detail, that if you pick a unnamed favourite and it goes off joint fav that entitles them if it comes in to STEAL your money. Why cant they have some pop that when you click on it, it tells you that if it goes off joint, that a 50% deduction will be taken, instead of being snide. I have took sp on loads of other sites when betting, and this has never happened to me before, so wont be using you ever again now.
Hi,
Sky Poker did nothing wrong in the Punta Cana matter, nothing wrong at all. It was all clearly covered in the T & C's.
"Unnamed joint favourites". If there are 2 - or 3, or even 4 JF's - you can't expect the Bookmaker to pay them all as winners, betting does not - & has never - worked like that. That rule has been in place with every bookmaker for the last 50 years or more to my certain knowledge.
If you had NAMED the horse, instead of "JF", you would have been paid in full.
Sorry you feel that is unfair, but it's not, it's Industry Standard practice.
I do not appear to have received the free bets for the 2 wins the Toffees had. If they can be found (and it might be my error), could someone have a bet with them if possible and give any winnings to charity, please
Apologies for being an a*se clown, am letting my frustration with my inability to pull the trigger on loads of winners get the better of me.
TY May I purpose the 'i'm mad as **** and i'm not going to take this anymore' thread