i have lost about 50 in the last few days playing cash but have made some great folds in that time and a lesser player would have lost more like a hundred.Its hard to see that as a positive though,lol.It got me thinking that if a player got unlucky over and over they could be a consistently losing,high quality player.What do you think?
0 ·
Comments
But in general if you think youre a good player who is just really unlucky youre probably just overestimating your skill. The hardest thing in poker is to be self analytical, and its pretty easy just to blame it all on variance.
Say for example you flop the nuts and go all in and everyone folds you may make a little bit, but was deffinatly not the maximum value, then the next hand you get 2nd nuts vs the nuts and go bust... if you had doubled with the nuts the hand before that would of paid for you then losing the next hand and you are still even rather than a buyin down or out of the tourney.
your last 250 games [ NO CASH ] ,
you are by these stats in my opinion ,
an average player,
i would if i was you drop down in stake level,
you may find it easier.
over and out roborover !
plenty of them
If the download enables pt/hem they have a good tool called all in ev/sklansky bucks. This will tell you in more detail what you would like to know.
atm, i think ur sample size is too small
but if your new to (real money ) poker (not that facebook crp)
and are losing this can be due to playing to many hands playing the hands you have out ov positon
not knowing what to bet , how to extract the maximum money
i would sergest reading phil gordons little green book of poker
i would class as probably the best book out there for begginers / average players
U can win alot on sky bingo u know! 20k for 2 pence!
DOHH