Surprising how often someone will have a 9 here that they will not fold, esp at micro/low stakes my default strategy would be shove all in, can think of 2 occasions where someone called a 3xpot shove with a 9, so you are probably losing money by checking down to save rake.
Personally I don't think its collusion. Collusion is when 2 or more players actively agree an action that is to the detriment of other players. Sky poker is not a player,they provide a service for which they get very well paid indeed. Rake should be considered in you betting strategy, and as such is part of the game. when someone goes all in, you do not get the value of his bet if you call, it is minus the rake on their bet also minus the rake on your call, so the odds are worse than it appears
I dont think it is collusion either, as Sir-Gary says you are not working together to the detriment of other player(s).
WIth IHU's comments it is a balance of rake saved over value lost to players who will call, seen players call overbet shoves with sets and 2 pair not just the low end of a straight. Some players are persistent non-believers or just cant lay down "a hand".
Maybe an issue with announcing your hand while action to come?
Don't see anything wrong with it, but if the villain told me he had Broadway, & suggested I should not bet, I'd snap go all-in. He might be telling porkies, after all. It has been known.....
Comments
other players. Sky poker is not a player,they provide a service for which they get very well paid indeed. Rake should be considered in you betting strategy, and as such is part of the game. when someone goes all in, you do not get the value of his bet if you call, it is minus the rake on their bet also minus the rake on your call, so the odds are worse than it appears
Don't see anything wrong with it, but if the villain told me he had Broadway, & suggested I should not bet, I'd snap go all-in. He might be telling porkies, after all. It has been known.....