Sharkscope has some failings, its a guide only. I do not use it myself but learnt how to after some comments on here. it was amusing to see how I lost a few hundred pounds getting to PUNTA CANA 2 years ago ( the value of the final entry) according to sharkscope, it ignored the value of the £4,500 package and that I sattalited in for just over £2-00. I don't bother with it myself , it gets sats wrong on a frequent basis, but as a rough indication its not that bad. as I just play when I want against whoever happens to be there it has very little purpose for me other than for fun. I last bothered to look about a year ago
For some reason Sharkscope is recording winners of the £4.80 sub satellites to the £110 main event as recieving £530 as opposed to a seat worth £24. Posted by FeelGroggy
Is a real pain that this is wrong, please can someone from sky correct this and credit my account with the £530 please!
For some reason UKOPS often records wrong on scope. Was lots of missing info on scope last year.
On the positive if we all keep playing them we can make our Sharkscope graphs look more impressive so I guess there's that ;-) With the amount of time these sats are gonna run for this event it's gonna massively skew profit figures
Comments
For some reason UKOPS often records wrong on scope. Was lots of missing info on scope last year.