I like mtts being top heavy but with 30 places paid and even down to 10th giving you just a fiver profit should the top 3 spots be worth over half the prize pool?
I like mtts being top heavy but with 30 places paid and even down to 10th giving you just a fiver profit should the top 3 spots be worth over half the prize pool? Posted by Jac35
I'm sure there are three people who would disagree!
In Response to Re: A starting stack of 10,000 chips for £5.50? Is it April the 1st? : I'm sure there are three people who would disagree! Posted by Brrrrrrr
I'm sure every there are
There's someone who came 10th though who would agree
I like mtts being top heavy but with 30 places paid and even down to 10th giving you just a fiver profit should the top 3 spots be worth over half the prize pool? Posted by Jac35
In Response to Re: A starting stack of 10,000 chips for £5.50? Is it April the 1st? : Agreed. Way too top heavy imo. Posted by goldnballz
+2, often when down to the final table for example it depends on who gets dealt the best cards and who wins the flips (not always obviously, but I am sure that most would agree that it is much better to run well at the end of a tourmament than at the beginning, you don't get anything for being chip leader outside the money).
Comments