All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Collusion detection

Phantom66Phantom66 Member Posts: 5,542
edited April 2017 in Poker Chat
Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection".

Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it.

Has anyone had a go?

What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it?

What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use?

On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good.

However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all **** will break loose if the site doesn't agree.

Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.
· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • DonttelmumDonttelmum Member Posts: 1,921
    edited March 2017
    dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
    · Share on Twitter
  • stuarty117stuarty117 Member Posts: 1,395
    edited March 2017
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection:
    dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
    Posted by Donttelmum
    Only if your not on his list :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • cpfc_2010cpfc_2010 Member Posts: 320
    edited March 2017
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection:
    dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
    Posted by Donttelmum
    Gold
    · Share on Twitter
  • Phantom66Phantom66 Member Posts: 5,542
    edited March 2017
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection:
    dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
    Posted by Donttelmum

    Post of the week, WP

    · Share on Twitter
  • EvilPinguEvilPingu Member Posts: 3,462
    edited March 2017
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection:
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection : Post of the week, WP
    Posted by Phantom66
    +1
    · Share on Twitter
  • kelly05kelly05 Member Posts: 19
    edited March 2017
    some one wake me up zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzIn Response to Collusion detection:
    Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection". Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it. Has anyone had a go? What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it? What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use? On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good. However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all **** will break loose if the site doesn't agree. Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.
    Posted by Phantom66
    · Share on Twitter
  • kelly05kelly05 Member Posts: 19
    edited March 2017
    some one wake me up zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzIn Response to Collusion detection:
    Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection". Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it. Has anyone had a go? What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it? What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use? On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good. However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all **** will break loose if the site doesn't agree. Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.
    Posted by Phantom66
    · Share on Twitter
  • DonttelmumDonttelmum Member Posts: 1,921
    edited March 2017
    To kind guys.
    · Share on Twitter
  • MilitantGMilitantG Member Posts: 204
    edited April 2017
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection:
    In Response to Re: Collusion detection : +1
    Posted by EvilPingu
    +2 LOL
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.