this looks tougher than todays card im struggling to fancy anything in the last. i would really like a banker here to allow more selections in the few open races. but i like the look of mirage dancer. cliffs of mohar won well but was in ireland which is not my strong point at all. anybody know anything about race? (in syndicate or not?).
evergate withdrew from todays last for the 3pm and a ok draw so connections there must fancy there chance. that with roseabelle will be a good race.
15 35 i can see a bigger priced horse winning.
we really need lots of voices on this 1 im thinking.
this looks tougher than todays card im struggling to fancy anything in the last. i would really like a banker here to allow more selections in the few open races. but i like the look of mirage dancer. cliffs of mohar won well but was in ireland which is not my strong point at all. anybody know anything about race? (in syndicate or not?). evergate withdrew from todays last for the 3pm and a ok draw so connections there must fancy there chance. that with roseabelle will be a good race. 15 35 i can see a bigger priced horse winning. we really need lots of voices on this 1 im thinking. Posted by MICKYBLUE
great minds think alike with Mirage Dancer and you are right 3.35 is one tough race
I've been having a look at the Friday Chester card, and I agree with MICKYB and VAIGRET that it is a lot more difficult than Thursday's card. I'm definitely struggling to see a banker with confidence.
CLIFFS OF MOHER is this year's hyped Superstar Ballydoyle Derby horse according to my Dad, who told me to watch out for it a month ago. I follow all Aidan O'Brien's horses, but I always like to see them run first in their 3-y-o career. His horses are in fantastic form, and it may well win, it's obviously got more speed than VENICE BEACH & Co. from Thursday, due to it being his only entry in the 2.25 race today, so it must be pretty good, but I think Michael Stoute's MIRAGE DANCER must be another horse with a huge amount of potential too, 'coz he often targets this race with his best 3-y-o, and I certainly wouldn't leave it out of any perm.
Obviously I'm not in the syndicate, but I would be taking a cautious view and sitting on my 'STACK' and waiting for a better spot.... (:D}
Tough to make the case for a single banker strategy.
I would be interested to see what plan B looks like but there are some pretty open races over the longer distances.
edit:Cliffs of Moher has been backed well into odds on territory so statistically you have your banker. Not as easy to oppose as Dahik was yesterday but there are 2 other genuine contenders in Bay of Poets and Mirage Dancer.
I wont be around later so GL if you are going for it.
im interested in a plan b as well. cliffs of moher is only the real banker, the rest of fav might win but there are lots of others with plus next to them
found my fancy in the last and just noticed vaigret has backed it aswell duke of firenze.
quite a few non runners already aswell which ill post on correct thread once its here
im interested in a plan b as well. cliffs of moher is only the real banker, the rest of fav might win but there are lots of others with plus next to them found my fancy in the last and just noticed vaigret has backed it aswell duke of firenze. quite a few non runners already aswell which ill post on correct thread once its here Posted by MICKYBLUE
I am looking at a two or three perm strategy, I will post a potential idea here (give me an hour) and you guys can decide if you think we should attempt it.
im sceptical atm, i can see some upsets but cant pick the upset if that makes any sense. will do my removers now and go from there. Posted by MICKYBLUE
OK, shall we pass?
It will take me an hour or so to do the A,B,C,D and E's so need to know fairly soon.
I am happy to give this one a miss if you feel it's likely to not be won.
We will always have other opportunities down the line, so don't need to rush into it.
I am happy to go with this - with my 2 shares it will only cost me £3.52 perhaps those with more shares would have different views! You might not get a lot of responses as people are at work etc. but as you have already put some effort in to this it would be a pity not to. If you others say no you should certailnly take their views on board though in the end it is your decision.
maybe stick with 3 in leg 3? thanks for listening Posted by MICKYBLUE
To have two selection instead of one in leg 6, and three selection instead of four in Leg 3 still increases price by 50%, so you need to take another one out somewhere
Comments
Getting a bit short of time, but if you could please give the three perm option on the opening post your approval or not by 12.30pm.
I will then use NAP's selections and removal data to work out the A,B,C,D,E's if it is a GO.
Cheers,
G
It will take me an hour or so to do the A,B,C,D and E's so need to know fairly soon.
I am happy to give this one a miss if you feel it's likely to not be won.
We will always have other opportunities down the line, so don't need to rush into it.
We can be patient. ;=)
I will go with the consensus.
Cheers,
G
P.S. Added set in stone in that perm for leg 5.
I will work on the A-E's and we'll make final decision at 1.30pm