SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!

IRISHROVER

 IS IT RIGHT TO GO DIGGING FOR PAST POSTS ON POSTERS,

WHEN THE GUY/GAL HAS ALREADY SAID SOZ HE/SHE WAS WRONG .

SHOULD SKYRICH DELETE THESE POSTS ,

SHOULD IT BE KNOCKED IN THE HEAD NOW B4 IT GETS OUT OF CONTROL .

DISCUSS BUT DONT TURN IN TO A SLANGING MATCH  PRETTY PLZZZZZZZZ !

MereNovice

One of the strengths of any forum is an archive of informative, insightful and amusing threads.
Just because the odd idiot tries to stir up trouble by resurrecting unfortunate ones shouldn't be allowed to impact on the access to other valuable threads.

NoseyBonk

On any forum you're going to be able to revive threads that have long been 'dead', it's just the way it has to be. As for 'is it right to go digging for posts' then it depends. What are the motives? I know what you're referring to and in that case I think the motive is clear - to cause trouble - however it won't work because us reglee-ers know better. 

Seagull158

Rover. Better tp ust let it go. We all know why it was done but the guy that did it didn't know the history of all the posts that followed. Not an excuse for him but just a fact. Don't give them the oxygen of publicity and don't rise to the bait.

cottlad

I'd rather read those posts than umpteen pointless poll threads

Mr_Miyagi

I think more posts should be dug up!

_Woof_

In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

I think more posts should be dug up!
Posted by Mr_Miyagi

But then all the fences would fall down ........... what a silly idea.

MAXALLY

In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

I think more posts should be dug up!
Posted by Mr_Miyagi

Are you working for Diggerman?

Mr_Miyagi

In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING! : But then all the fences would fall down ........... what a silly idea.
Posted by _Woof_

Fences do nothing except keep people apart. Maybe if there was no fences we would all get along and Dohhh would not hate James Hartigan!

loonytoons

But after fences are gone we can build bridges??

Mr_Miyagi

for sure!

emilyegg

Whatever Happens, if it is right or wrong, nasty or nice, rude or funny, disrespectful or decent, destructive or constructive.....

WE ARE ALL IN THE SAME COMMUNITY...AND A FANTASTIC ONE AT THAT.

PLEASE, think about this before we are all Censored, Barred or Scoffed at.

I believe we are privileged to post on here. Its the BEST.

emilyegg

And if anyone starts on ME, Then kidpoker is coming back.....




The Prosecution calls Mr Vinny Gambini........

penguin7

In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

But after fences are gone we can build bridges??
Posted by loonytoons

What happens if you burn your bridges ?

Macacan

In Response to SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

 IS IT RIGHT TO GO DIGGING FOR PAST POSTS ON POSTERS, WHEN THE GUY/GAL HAS ALREADY SAID SOZ HE/SHE WAS WRONG . SHOULD SKYRICH DELETE THESE POSTS , SHOULD IT BE KNOCKED IN THE HEAD NOW B4 IT GETS OUT OF CONTROL . DISCUSS BUT DONT TURN IN TO A SLANGING MATCH  PRETTY PLZZZZZZZZ !
Posted by IRISHROVER

I like the thought, i dont think such a rule could be monitored properly, unless every post was is put out of reach. Reading through last nights and this mornings threads, its  ashame the way they have panned out in to  such a frenzy.

I think the orignal post should be deleted, but at the request of, or by those involed.

Maca