You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

** JACKPOT SYNDICATE ** REMOVER'S SPREADSHEET FOR GO-LIVE AT LEICESTER ON THURS 07/12/17 **

StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
Hi guys, please find removers spreadsheet below:

Please remove 24 of the LIGHT BLUE including at least TWO from each leg:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1McQ5i7rno_7rgpRMYUukviiv8gi6zX0tZp4Stptfz6Q/edit?ts=5a2825f0#gid=0

GL!

P.S. Some RP Odds are not available at time of posting. I will update these when I return later tonight

Comments

  • StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
    PLEASE REMOVE 24 OF THE LIGHT BLUE, INCLUDING AT LEAST 2 IN EACH LEG BY 11.10AM.

    I WILL ALLOW "A FEW" AMENDMENTS BEFORE THE OFF OF THE FIRST RACE. TO REPLACE A SELECTION COPY PASTE A "WHITE CELL" OVER YOUR OLD SELECTION.

    SELECTIONS ARE FINAL AFTER FIRST RACE STARTS.

    GL!

    Cheers,

    G
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    posted on wrong thread. Ok for me to do updates on Removers G
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    24 removers tough but will try LOL

    12.40 GLEN ROCCO worries me being left out
  • wynne1938wynne1938 Member Posts: 20,556
    edited December 2017
    Could you add 2.15 04: SWEET SHIRLEEN

    Ran in a class 3 handicap hurdle last month, this is a Class 4.
    The jockey is a conditional up and coming young rider by the name of Jonjo O;Nei
    ( Jonjo O'Neil's son)

    He also rides Cliffside park in the 1.10(one of my Naps)
  • StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
    edited December 2017
    Hi guys, regarding GLEN ROCCO and SWEET SHIRLEEN.

    Over recent times I have tried to accommodate people's requests to leave more in by allowing some 25/1 shots to be in the remover's, but I really have to draw the line at 33/1 shots plus.

    The inclusion of 25/1 shots means the number requiring removal must be higher, so there is a trade off.

    It simply is so -ev to have them in, as if they won an SP accumulator would pay way more than the Jackpot would, so one would be better off doing the lines with them in as an SP accumulator.

    As you know an SP accumulator is very -ev, as effectively most fixed priced multiples are.

    Anyhow, I will monitor these two horses and see if there is any movement for them in the market.

    It is too late to put them in LIGHT BLUE now as some people have already made their selections. If they win, then you have made your point, however they would have to come in drastically in price to be considered.

    Cheers,

    G

  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    StayOrGo said:

    Hi guys, regarding GLEN ROCCO and SWEET SHIRLEEN.

    Over recent times I have tried to accommodate people's requests to leave more in by allowing some 25/1 shots to be in the remover's, but I really have to draw the line at 33/1 shots plus.

    The inclusion of 25/1 shots means the number requiring removal must be higher, so there is a trade off.

    It simply is so -ev to have them in, as if they won an SP accumulator would pay way more than the Jackpot would, so one would be better off doing the lines with them in as an SP accumulator.

    As you know an SP accumulator is very -ev, as effectively most fixed priced multiples are.

    Anyhow, I will monitor these two horses and see if there is any movement for them in the market.

    It is too late to put them in LIGHT BLUE now as some people have already made their selections. If they win, then you have made your point, however they would have to come in drastically in price to be considered.

    Cheers,

    G

    Hi G,

    No problem from here with anything you said above, just wanted to flag it up as one to keep an eye on

    V
  • StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
    vaigret said:

    StayOrGo said:

    Hi guys, regarding GLEN ROCCO and SWEET SHIRLEEN.

    Over recent times I have tried to accommodate people's requests to leave more in by allowing some 25/1 shots to be in the remover's, but I really have to draw the line at 33/1 shots plus.

    The inclusion of 25/1 shots means the number requiring removal must be higher, so there is a trade off.

    It simply is so -ev to have them in, as if they won an SP accumulator would pay way more than the Jackpot would, so one would be better off doing the lines with them in as an SP accumulator.

    As you know an SP accumulator is very -ev, as effectively most fixed priced multiples are.

    Anyhow, I will monitor these two horses and see if there is any movement for them in the market.

    It is too late to put them in LIGHT BLUE now as some people have already made their selections. If they win, then you have made your point, however they would have to come in drastically in price to be considered.

    Cheers,

    G

    Hi G,

    No problem from here with anything you said above, just wanted to flag it up as one to keep an eye on

    V
    Yes happy for you, Wynne etc to flag up these horses, I will keep an eye out for any market moves.

    Cheers,

    G
  • StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
    vaigret said:

    posted on wrong thread. Ok for me to do updates on Removers G

    Yes please. TY
  • MISTY4MEMISTY4ME Member Posts: 6,320
    Really tough going today removing 24 :/ ........ I'll be seriously impressed with anyone getting a Clean Sheet. o:)
Sign In or Register to comment.