** JACKPOT SYNDICATE ** REMOVALS FOR GO-LIVE AT CHELTENHAM ON 01/01/2018 ** REMOVE 20 ** GL! HNY **

StayOrGo

Please remove twenty including at least one in each leg:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10dvbNNYjzXlL37_KgS72FpLKUfpMPNlVOteRfl6jx8I/edit#gid=0

I appreciate it's New Year, so just do it if you have time.

Cheers,

G

StayOrGo

I have made quite a lot of changes to the template, so if things aren't working quite right, let me know.

vaigret

seemed to work well for me Graham

StayOrGo

vaigret said:

seemed to work well for me Graham

Good, you will also find a copy of the new points scoring system in the upper right corner.

wynne1938

DONE.

In the 12.15 you have horse number 6 as Springtimre Lake,should be Springtown Lake

StayOrGo

Happy New Year all.

I have had a first pass at tomorrow's GO-LIVE selections.

Subject to change based on NR's, Market Moves etc.

Cheers,

G

zadoc

VWP SNUFFER, EXCELLANT SCORE

Snuffer

zadoc said:

VWP SNUFFER, EXCELLANT SCORE

Cheers Roger

StayOrGo

Please can Wynne and Mist verify their scores. TY

StayOrGo

It does look as though winners are being more appropriately penalised by the new system, so hopefully it will cause a change in priority amongst removers, to try and get zero winners as their first priority, which is want I always wanted the "mindset" to be, as that is what serves the purpose and the syndicate best.

GL all going forward!

G

vaigret

yes definitely better and much fairer Graham and well done snuffer

StayOrGo

vaigret said:

yes definitely better and much fairer Graham and well done snuffer

Thanks to your help in the first place pointing it out V.

I will watch your selections with interest as you now try to balance statistics and horse form opinions. Knowing you, I am sure you will adapt well.

GL!

wynne1938

StayOrGo said:

Please can Wynne and Mist verify their scores. TY

DONE

vaigret

StayOrGo said:

vaigret said:

yes definitely better and much fairer Graham and well done snuffer

Thanks to your help in the first place pointing it out V.

I will watch your selections with interest as you now try to balance statistics and horse form opinions. Knowing you, I am sure you will adapt well.

GL!

thanks, I had a bit of a brainstorm today but will still go against horses that are too short for their price. So doubt I will retain title.

StayOrGo

Surely the strategy has to be to play as optimally as you can to retain title. Using statistics and interpretation of horse form?

vaigret

StayOrGo said:

Surely the strategy has to be to play as optimally as you can to retain title. Using statistics and interpretation of horse form?

of course it is and I will be trying there is no doubt about it but I will not back or nap a horse that is 6-4 and should be 3-1 for example and that is the same for removers. If I think a 6-4 shot has less chance than a 9-1 and I have the choice between the two I will always get rid of the 6-4.

As i said I was stupid today, if I fancied Willoughby court I should never have removed Yarnworth and in fact that was good vale at the price today. Also I did too quickly re time of year and worked from the first race through until I had reached 20. Should have reviewed them.

Dont worry I will be trying . its such good fun.

Lets hope the removals system narrows the fields even more now and we have many more wins.

Good luck us

vaigret

Graham
On the stats/value point all you need to do to is look at my Nursery thread. Who would have thought that backing 260 horses in nurseries could give you a profit over £100 backing all of them at £1 stake. shows that horses which the handicapper already has a better angle on are underpriced/over backed.
The only thing I cant work out is that how many trainers/owners who have worked the system let their horse go off at 40-1 , 33-1, 25-1, etc etc .

Im just hoping they dont work that out by next flat season LOL

V

StayOrGo

Yes I take your point, and yes, we were so, so close today.

Your input will be valued as always.

GL!