** JACKPOT SYNDICATE ** JANUARY 2018 REMOVERS LEADER BOARDS **

StayOrGo

1ST JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT CHELTENHAM:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSQNWMrkSemRCFkczh8Ks-J6X4QGYV0GbT9n4bT3dtZDZyz-K-MIkOhVlvjKqpl-g0jtoQ-qlm-xN-Y/pubhtml

VWP Snuffer!

StayOrGo

4TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT WOLVERHAMPTON:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTg-x2quJMekvrU9FOBEKnZjkWCvCINbx_k35D0Zs2uKSD1Eez80YVZAdReh1H8LHd1o_AnbkS7uoW9/pubhtml

Snuffer extends his lead, VWP sir!

vaigret

All agreed but shouldnt MISTY4ME have the following

Average score for today as first miss of a month

SELECTIONS 21 (average) POINTS 34 OR 35 (Average depending whether you are rounding up or down,Ive given him 35) WINNERS 1 making totals

POINTS 31 SELECTIONS 41 WINNERS 4 AVERAGE 0.756

StayOrGo

Hi V.

Misty has declared himself as a part time contributor, which is fine. So he can contribute as and when he wants, and we will keep his scores, but his position will just be N/A. (I know I have him as 7th atm, as I thought it did no harm)

It's more hassle than it's worth calculating averages and min values etc, for known part time contributors.

This way he can still contribute when he wants to, without it being an administrative headache.

Similar principle with his NAPS, except if he does exceed 70% then his score will be valid.

Everyone else has "declared" themselves as full time, so "average rules" etc will apply to them, but hopefully won't have to be used to often.

I hope this clarifies.

Cheers,

G

vaigret

fine mate i will disregard Misty4me for removers completely and for naps N/A unless he reaches the average

StayOrGo

7TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT PLUMPTON:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTCPz0IPkdtBS839ArJJuLFKYnrm6hFmteOWDbQLyhNuX1WtjYzrfn3tdbLRwZdarWd1TZG1oXYsha7/pubhtml

VWP Vaigret and Rab on a tough day!

vaigret

Graham I will check the Removers upto and inc 8/1/18 when posted.

StayOrGo

8TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT WOLVERHAMPTON:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTQul5eRGdAukIQSMXNxT6s5uEPsEYxvP0vqMhhjnMADbx-ZLugiIw-jFSZtRDlBHQOPWjGb64Z48D6/pubhtml

VWP all, some good scores all round, contributing to our successful attempt. Well done guys!

vaigret

removers all agreed up to and including 8/1/18

vaigret

removers all agreed up to and including 11/1/18

StayOrGo

11TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT CATTERICK:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTZiTeRXmzg6VUwweFnTTuFkfH2fkFfd7RsZzNqx3HHyvuH3aQslNNUA-4R7n7uPHbd9rfh6AMCfeuf/pubhtml

Outstanding Snuffer!

vaigret

+1 AND ALL AGREED

StayOrGo

Thx mate, try to remember not to quote, so we don't have duplicate entries, maybe you can amend?

Comments are fine and replies to people's comments also, but just not replying to the result link.

Cheers,

G

vaigret

sorry forgot have amended

StayOrGo

15TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT AYR:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQEujKpAbTGBq84FRzb2A2txMG6D7vX0Nf9uGMYJG42ktDwVe007zEm06yZ1sYtzTPskFiv4HAMU9hR/pubhtml

VWP to V, as well as doing well in the NAP's, he was the least worse remover today.

Only V, Misty and Roger managed positive figures, tough day!

wynne1938

Well doneV,Misty and Roger

vaigret

removers after ayr all agreed and thnx for kind words

StayOrGo

17TH JANUARY 2018 RESULTS AFTER GO-LIVE AT MARKET RASEN:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQYTreQP8eb9K5Cl0PTCkxx29tHvtckZckXEN0wzGRMgunAE0H8MUmqNEUflz44vTtK-L2G2WEiQPKe/pubhtml

Brutal day, only Misty survived the curse of negative figures. Zadoc takes advantage as others falter and moves up into 2nd place.

It looks like the new system will be a war of attrition, who can find those losers?

vaigret

removers all agreed including 17/1/18

StayOrGo

Hi all. A note for all, if you pick any non runners in your removals, please DO replace them. Clearly anyone who has less runners has an easier task, as it's often the last couple that are the trickiest.

Obviously if you are away, that's unavoidable and also if the non runner comes after the first race starts, but other that that, please do replace, so that the system is fair to all.

Cheers,

G

vaigret

StayOrGo said:

Hi all. A note for all, if you pick any non runners in your removals, please DO replace them. Clearly anyone who has less runners has an easier task, as it's often the last couple that are the trickiest.

Obviously if you are away, that's unavoidable and also if the non runner comes after the first race starts, but other that that, please do replace, so that the system is fair to all.

Cheers,

G

G

Hi G, this difficult one as I always pick from the declared runners at the time I do my removers which is usually the night before and therefore dont know that one is going to be a non runner. By picking that early you lose the chance to see late market movers and I do not swap removers nearer the off as it is not fair to you when picking the horses. Also by having a non runner you are losing the opportunity of plus points which is why
i thought we had averages.

As I say difficult but having to adjust your removers when non runners occur after you pick them is a bit harsh . also you could want to adjust a few not just the non runner as the race dynamics have changed.

V