You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Bluff/Bluff Catch or fold

The_eggsThe_eggs Member Posts: 57
Any thoughts on this spot would be great :)

Best move on river?

I felt like bluffing seemed good as we have the best blockers and don't beat much but also not sure he is folding any 2pr+ maybe not even a Ace given the action. Should I just fold turn if I don't ever bluff or call rivers?
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
******Small blind50.0050.009875.00
******Big blind100.00150.0011075.00
Your hole cards
  • K
  • K
SCHEMERFold
The_eggsRaise250.00400.007590.00
MattBatesFold
spartan300Fold
******Call200.00600.009675.00
******Call150.00750.0010925.00
Flop
  • A
  • 3
  • 6
******Check
******Check
The_eggsCheck
Turn
  • Q
******Bet300.001050.009375.00
******Call300.001350.0010625.00
The_eggsCall300.001650.007290.00
River
  • 10
******Check
******Bet900.002550.009725.00

Comments

  • MynaFrettMynaFrett Member Posts: 754
    Hello @The_eggs

    Interesting spot, particularly as our blockers work against us on the turn (blocking basically a load of the stuff we want them to have (KJ/K10 combo's and obviously K high flush draws) and we don't block any of their value (only KQ) but can work in our favour on that exact river as you point out :D

    Calling facing this river bet doesn't seem particularly good over all though as we block KQ which might be the worst made hand villain could possibly show up with here and we only beat some unlikely combo's of 75, 74 and 54 (and these combo's in diamonds get there of course)... he can't even have J10d which could conceivably take this line and decide to bluff river. He is also in a really bad spot to be flatting the small blinds turn lead with some 6x and some small to middling pocket pairs but I suppose it is possible that he can still show up with some of these. If he has somehow flatted turn with some 6x and pp, he will likely cap your range at KQ, KK weak Ax at best (once you've checked back flop and flatted turn) and could well see this river as a great card to turn these into bluffs now. The thing is (as your range is perceived to be weak/capped here now) he can conceivably bet most of his Ax for value as well. He also has aces up, sets and flushes in his range though and you might not be getting much of this to fold as played...

    This flop is almost a mandatory c bet, or will be perceived as such, with our range in this spot versus the blinds (we have AAA, AK and AQ and they don't/shouldn't have very often) so you will be expected to be c betting here at a high frequency and when you don't they might immediately take all the strong value hands (sets, aces up and AK/AQ/AJ) out of your range along with your flush draws and stuff like KQ/KJ/K10/QJ/Q10/J10/J9 which is significant on certain runouts when a lot of these combo's that population might expect you to c bet in these spots end up making possible straights and flushes. I think checking back some of these hands in these spots can be a good way to ensure that we can still show up with some disguised nutted hands on certain runouts (and protects our "capped" range when we don't c bet flop) but population probably doesn't see it this way and won't expect you to be able to show up with straights and flushes very often as played in these spots.

    So your bluff here with the nut blocker might not get two pair to fold, he might think AxJd is a good hand to bet/call with... he might not even fold any ace sometimes as you suggested because your line will look so random. You could conceivably have some flopped and turned sets but checking back flopped sets here would not be particularly good given how often we are expected to c bet this flop with our range and how deep effective stacks are and you would be expected to raise turn if you had taken this line with a flopped set or turned Queens.

    If you have history with villain, or he has seen that you can show up with flushes here, then I think it's a great spot to take with the Kd though.

    Given that we are over calling turn (calling a bet and a call) you could make a case for just folding this combo of KK on turn but I think it's fine to call here given how deep we are- we can be ahead of both of them still sometimes, although unlikely, there's still the chance that river checks through and we're good or we improve to a set of kings on the river and potentially win a big pot against two pair or set over set sometimes.

    ...My first bash at one of these. It's daunting with the likes of @FeelGroggy and @Duesenberg knocking about :#

    I hope this contribution is ok for you @The_eggs and I hope the good players don't rip this to shreds or it might be my first and last :D
  • LnarinOOLnarinOO Member Posts: 545
    MynaFrett said:

    Hello @The_eggs

    Interesting spot, particularly as our blockers work against us on the turn (blocking basically a load of the stuff we want them to have (KJ/K10 combo's and obviously K high flush draws) and we don't block any of their value (only KQ) but can work in our favour on that exact river as you point out :D

    Calling facing this river bet doesn't seem particularly good over all though as we block KQ which might be the worst made hand villain could possibly show up with here and we only beat some unlikely combo's of 75, 74 and 54 (and these combo's in diamonds get there of course)... he can't even have J10d which could conceivably take this line and decide to bluff river. He is also in a really bad spot to be flatting the small blinds turn lead with some 6x and some small to middling pocket pairs but I suppose it is possible that he can still show up with some of these. If he has somehow flatted turn with some 6x and pp, he will likely cap your range at KQ, KK weak Ax at best (once you've checked back flop and flatted turn) and could well see this river as a great card to turn these into bluffs now. The thing is (as your range is perceived to be weak/capped here now) he can conceivably bet most of his Ax for value as well. He also has aces up, sets and flushes in his range though and you might not be getting much of this to fold as played...

    This flop is almost a mandatory c bet, or will be perceived as such, with our range in this spot versus the blinds (we have AAA, AK and AQ and they don't/shouldn't have very often) so you will be expected to be c betting here at a high frequency and when you don't they might immediately take all the strong value hands (sets, aces up and AK/AQ/AJ) out of your range along with your flush draws and stuff like KQ/KJ/K10/QJ/Q10/J10/J9 which is significant on certain runouts when a lot of these combo's that population might expect you to c bet in these spots end up making possible straights and flushes. I think checking back some of these hands in these spots can be a good way to ensure that we can still show up with some disguised nutted hands on certain runouts (and protects our "capped" range when we don't c bet flop) but population probably doesn't see it this way and won't expect you to be able to show up with straights and flushes very often as played in these spots.

    So your bluff here with the nut blocker might not get two pair to fold, he might think AxJd is a good hand to bet/call with... he might not even fold any ace sometimes as you suggested because your line will look so random. You could conceivably have some flopped and turned sets but checking back flopped sets here would not be particularly good given how often we are expected to c bet this flop with our range and how deep effective stacks are and you would be expected to raise turn if you had taken this line with a flopped set or turned Queens.

    If you have history with villain, or he has seen that you can show up with flushes here, then I think it's a great spot to take with the Kd though.

    Given that we are over calling turn (calling a bet and a call) you could make a case for just folding this combo of KK on turn but I think it's fine to call here given how deep we are- we can be ahead of both of them still sometimes, although unlikely, there's still the chance that river checks through and we're good or we improve to a set of kings on the river and potentially win a big pot against two pair or set over set sometimes.

    ...My first bash at one of these. It's daunting with the likes of @FeelGroggy and @Duesenberg knocking about :#

    I hope this contribution is ok for you @The_eggs and I hope the good players don't rip this to shreds or it might be my first and last :D

    agree with most of this its a good post so nothing to be ripped apart, the best thing about poker is there's more than one 'right' way of playing due to how complex the game is, if one person has a different line i may not be incorrect or correct, it might mean they construct certain hands or ranges in different ways or figured something out that other people havnt figured out yet.

    the only thing i would differ from is when you say cbetting this is mandatory. i dont think this i a good board to bet your whole range tbh, they both have a lot of Ax for one and also if we bet our enitre range, think how many hands were actually betting, yes we have all the nuts like you say, but we also have all the garbage too, but if we only bet the nutted part and give up the rest then were easily exploitable and weak when we check, but if we split our range into bets and checks we can strengthen our checking range (by balancing with nuts) and ppl cant just run us over when we check. basically if were betting everything here, were betting too much then ppl can counter us by floating and taking away on later streets as our entire continue range will be too weak to bet multiple barrels or stand up to aggression down the hand.

    as played just fold river =)
  • LnarinOOLnarinOO Member Posts: 545
    maybe put a little more simply, when we bet KK here what do we get called by?
    not many worse hands can call and were not going to deny any equity by betting so it doesn't achieve too much.

    id rather bet the worst and best part and have a stronger check back range with Ax included..

    also 3 ways were even less likey to get folds OTF
  • The_eggsThe_eggs Member Posts: 57
    Yeah the Cbet is interesting but when I bet I am thinking about two things.

    Am I denying equity to any hands that I currently beat that could get there, does my hand need protection?

    Do I want to build a big pot because I think I have the strongest hand?

    In my head I answered no to both of these so I checked. I wouldn't want to get raised on flop and it gives me a hand that allows me to call loads on the turn against probes.

    I think it being multi way slightly makes ranges a bit more narrow.

    Thanks Myna and Lnarin it has given me some stuff to think about.
  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    Great post @MynaFrett . Poker is about opinions, with these threads the key (as you have done) is to articulate your thought process. To get good debate, for someone to agree or disagree with what you have said they need to understand why you are saying what you are. Sometimes people can make the right decision based on incorrect logic so its good to know peoples thought process. Never be afraid to express your opinion.
  • DuesenbergDuesenberg Member Posts: 1,746
    All sounds like pretty good stuff to me.

    In fairness to @MynaFrett, I think his point was more about how this flop would be perceived to be a mandatory cbet for the pre flop raiser by our opponents, rather than an outright suggestion that we should be firing out on all A high flops as the pfr. I completely concur with checking back KK here and would also be checking some of my weaker aces too. You'll induce a lot of turn probes this way which ultimately has a much higher EV than potentially folding out all the stuff you're already beating on the flop.

    The rest of the hand was played fine imo and folding the river seems best. I think it's very rare the small blind is leading out here as a bluff and you are not beating any of his value range with KK. Despite having some good blockers, as played, it's really hard for you to have many hands which want to convincingly raise this river for value, with the possible exception of TT or KJ. You'll be getting snap called too frequently and the small blinds hand looks so much like some random flush or either AT or QT to me.
  • MynaFrettMynaFrett Member Posts: 754
    Yes, was talking about range and perception obviously, not our actual holding. I would be checking KK here. You could make a case for betting flop and barrelling on turned diamonds though with this exact combo against what is likely weaker Ax a lot of the time... but that's a little high variance for me :D

  • LnarinOOLnarinOO Member Posts: 545
    MynaFrett said:

    Yes, was talking about range and perception obviously, not our actual holding. I would be checking KK here. You could make a case for betting flop and barrelling on turned diamonds though with this exact combo against what is likely weaker Ax a lot of the time... but that's a little high variance for me :D

    haha makes sense, obviously i read it wrong lol.. yea im in for barrelling KdKx !!
  • The_eggsThe_eggs Member Posts: 57
    Thanks a lot for all the input guys, I did feel it was a good spot to discuss but easy to think "am I just posting a standard spot here".

    I raised to 2000 and got the fold for anyone interested B)
  • MynaFrettMynaFrett Member Posts: 754
    The_eggs said:

    ... I raised to 2000 and got the fold for anyone interested B)

    :o Like a boss!
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 169,576

    Been a good read, this one, think I've learned something from every post on the thread. Mainly that you all play way too good.
Sign In or Register to comment.