2yo(18Feb16 gr f) TrainerJohn Gallagher (Last 14 days: 2-7, 29%) OwnerM C S D Racing Partnership SireHellvelyn (GB) (6.3f) DamBall Burst (IRE) Dam's SireImperial Ballet (IRE) (7.4f) BreederTrickledown Stud Limited DECLARED Tomorrow2:15 Bath 5f JockeyJoey Haynes (Last 14 days: 1-13,8%) RPR40 CommentOut of a 2yo sprint winner but was a well-beaten 40-1 shot over C&D on debut 17 days ago.
Trainer:
Last 14 days Wins: 2Runs: 8(25%) Since win flat: 2 runs 4 days
2yo(18Feb16 gr f) TrainerJohn Gallagher (Last 14 days: 2-7, 29%) OwnerM C S D Racing Partnership SireHellvelyn (GB) (6.3f) DamBall Burst (IRE) Dam's SireImperial Ballet (IRE) (7.4f) BreederTrickledown Stud Limited DECLARED Tomorrow2:15 Bath 5f JockeyJoey Haynes (Last 14 days: 1-13,8%) RPR40 CommentOut of a 2yo sprint winner but was a well-beaten 40-1 shot over C&D on debut 17 days ago.
Trainer:
Last 14 days Wins: 2Runs: 8(25%) Since win flat: 2 runs 4 days
I would be more worried about his Swiss Miss in 4.00 with De sousa aboard Wynne
The thing with the horses you mention is that if they were to win, then the SP accumulator of the first 6 races would pay more than the Jackpot dividend, and that fact alone means that any line with them in is -ev, which is why they are not selected.
They may well be value at the price, if so, you should back them singularly, however for a Jackpot bet, unless the odds come in significantly, it would not be value.
If a 25/1 or 33/1 winner came in, it would without doubt make the SP accumulator > 10,000/1 and a £10K dividend is the best we could hope for via a Jackpot bet, when the roll over is so small.
So if it feels like I am dismissing these selections, that is the reason why. Nothing to do with my assessment of their ability. However if their price dramatically came in, then I would/will consider them, as the above would then not necessarily apply.
The thing with the horses you mention is that if they were to win, then the SP accumulator of the first 6 races would pay more than the Jackpot dividend, and that fact alone means that any line with them in is -ev, which is why they are not selected.
They may well be value at the price, if so, you should back them singularly, however for a Jackpot bet, unless the odds come in significantly, it would not be value.
If a 25/1 or 33/1 winner came in, it would without doubt make the SP accumulator > 10,000/1 and a £10K dividend is the best we could hope for via a Jackpot bet, when the roll over is so small.
So if it feels like I am dismissing these selections, that is the reason why. Nothing to do with my assessment of their ability. However if their price dramatically came in, then I would/will consider them, as the above would then not necessarily apply.
Hope this makes sense.
Cheers,
G
I agree with you 100 percent. Thanks for your reply. I like your explanation and theory. We learn something new every day,I know I have become a more shrewd punter since I met you. Good luck today
2yo(18Feb16 gr f) TrainerJohn Gallagher (Last 14 days: 2-7, 29%) OwnerM C S D Racing Partnership SireHellvelyn (GB) (6.3f) DamBall Burst (IRE) Dam's SireImperial Ballet (IRE) (7.4f) BreederTrickledown Stud Limited DECLARED Tomorrow2:15 Bath 5f JockeyJoey Haynes (Last 14 days: 1-13,8%) RPR40 CommentOut of a 2yo sprint winner but was a well-beaten 40-1 shot over C&D on debut 17 days ago.
Trainer:
Last 14 days Wins: 2Runs: 8(25%) Since win flat: 2 runs 4 days
I would be more worried about his Swiss Miss in 4.00 with De sousa aboard Wynne
G, in the 4.35 you have pasted your removal in the wrong row, didn't want to change it for you as not sure if your removal is TRICKSY SPIRIT or AIRSHOW.
The thing with the horses you mention is that if they were to win, then the SP accumulator of the first 6 races would pay more than the Jackpot dividend, and that fact alone means that any line with them in is -ev, which is why they are not selected.
They may well be value at the price, if so, you should back them singularly, however for a Jackpot bet, unless the odds come in significantly, it would not be value.
If a 25/1 or 33/1 winner came in, it would without doubt make the SP accumulator > 10,000/1 and a £10K dividend is the best we could hope for via a Jackpot bet, when the roll over is so small.
So if it feels like I am dismissing these selections, that is the reason why. Nothing to do with my assessment of their ability. However if their price dramatically came in, then I would/will consider them, as the above would then not necessarily apply.
Hope this makes sense.
Cheers,
G
On the same page G, just advising wynne thre was another Gallagher horse he should look at.
Comments
I WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO YOUR LIST
2.15: MAID FROM THE MIST
4.00: MAX GUEVARA
I won't change anything for now, but will keep an eye out for any market moves.
2yo(18Feb16 gr f)
TrainerJohn Gallagher (Last 14 days: 2-7, 29%)
OwnerM C S D Racing Partnership
SireHellvelyn (GB) (6.3f)
DamBall Burst (IRE)
Dam's SireImperial Ballet (IRE) (7.4f)
BreederTrickledown Stud Limited
DECLARED
Tomorrow2:15 Bath 5f
JockeyJoey Haynes (Last 14 days: 1-13,8%)
RPR40
CommentOut of a 2yo sprint winner but was a well-beaten 40-1 shot over C&D on debut 17 days ago.
Trainer:
Last 14 days
Wins: 2Runs: 8(25%)
Since win flat: 2 runs 4 days
2yo(07Apr16 b c)
TrainerWilliam Muir (Last 14 days: 1-3, 33%)
OwnerF Hope & G Hope
SireAlhebayeb (IRE)
DamAssumption (IRE)
Dam's SireBeckett (IRE) (8.3f)
BreederD G Iceton
DECLARED
Tomorrow4:00 Bath 5f
JockeyMartin Dwyer (Last 14 days: 2-11,18%)
Trainer:
Last 14 days
Wins: 1Runs: 2(50%)
Since win flat: 0 runs 4 days
The thing with the horses you mention is that if they were to win, then the SP accumulator of the first 6 races would pay more than the Jackpot dividend, and that fact alone means that any line with them in is -ev, which is why they are not selected.
They may well be value at the price, if so, you should back them singularly, however for a Jackpot bet, unless the odds come in significantly, it would not be value.
If a 25/1 or 33/1 winner came in, it would without doubt make the SP accumulator > 10,000/1 and a £10K dividend is the best we could hope for via a Jackpot bet, when the roll over is so small.
So if it feels like I am dismissing these selections, that is the reason why. Nothing to do with my assessment of their ability. However if their price dramatically came in, then I would/will consider them, as the above would then not necessarily apply.
Hope this makes sense.
Cheers,
G
Thanks for your reply.
I like your explanation and theory.
We learn something new every day,I know I have become a more shrewd punter since I met you.
Good luck today
2.15: QUICK
2.50: PROMINNA
3.25: DIVINE CALL
SPIRIT OF ZEBEDEE
4.35: BEZOS
The sheet is ready for tomorrow and as it's not a GO-LIVE I will sort tables etc after session tonight.
Thanks,
G