Based upon what can be seen on Sharkscope, no, if I were you, I'd stay at your current levels.
If you want to improve your numbers, first up, I'd stop playing SNG's. Sharky suggests you are a small loser over a 250+ game sample. Variance in SNG's is much lower than in MTT's, so those figures are probably about right, & maybe SNG's are not your strength.
In MTT's your numbers are MUCH better, showing a nice profit over a 500 game sample. However, 500 MTT's is way too small a sample size to take too much from those numbers. You could be the best, or you could be pretty bad - 500 MTT's does not really tell us much.
You look to be doing pretty well from what I can see, so I think my advice would be to stay as you are, but either stop playing, or improve your game, at SNG's.
Comments
Based upon what can be seen on Sharkscope, no, if I were you, I'd stay at your current levels.
If you want to improve your numbers, first up, I'd stop playing SNG's. Sharky suggests you are a small loser over a 250+ game sample. Variance in SNG's is much lower than in MTT's, so those figures are probably about right, & maybe SNG's are not your strength.
In MTT's your numbers are MUCH better, showing a nice profit over a 500 game sample. However, 500 MTT's is way too small a sample size to take too much from those numbers. You could be the best, or you could be pretty bad - 500 MTT's does not really tell us much.
You look to be doing pretty well from what I can see, so I think my advice would be to stay as you are, but either stop playing, or improve your game, at SNG's.
Good luck bud.