All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Manchester semi

tai-gartai-gar Member Posts: 2,703
in Poker Chat
What happened to the Manchester semi tonight?
Anyone know?
Not enough runners?
or just missing from list?
· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • EssexphilEssexphil Member Posts: 8,874
    edited January 2019
    Not enough runners
    Due to the fact that the qualifier finished 2 minutes too late
    And the 4 of us who did qualify are waiting for our £48 or seat in the next one....
    · Share on Twitter
  • tai-gartai-gar Member Posts: 2,703
    OK thanks for letting me know. Pity about that though. Good luck in next one.
    · Share on Twitter
  • Sky_SamTSky_SamT Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 984
    Essexphil said:

    Not enough runners
    Due to the fact that the qualifier finished 2 minutes too late
    And the 4 of us who did qualify are waiting for our £48 or seat in the next one....

    £48 should be in your account. Apologies, the quarter went on for longer than we expected. Typical poor planning from James.
    · Share on Twitter
  • EssexphilEssexphil Member Posts: 8,874
    Sky_SamT said:

    Essexphil said:

    Not enough runners
    Due to the fact that the qualifier finished 2 minutes too late
    And the 4 of us who did qualify are waiting for our £48 or seat in the next one....

    £48 should be in your account. Apologies, the quarter went on for longer than we expected. Typical poor planning from James.
    It is, thanks.

    These normally run perfectly. When this one got down to 5 (the bubble), 1 of the players seemed very inexperienced, which caused delays.

    In addition, i was playing too many tables-I saw the message from 1 player saying they were happy to get £48, but missed 2 people asking me to buy in until it was too late.

    See you in Manchester.
    · Share on Twitter
  • madprofmadprof Member Posts: 3,461
    Hey Phil....I wouldn't say @hanson was THAT inexperienced.......he doesn't normally delay, in fact I'm told he's even quicker normally...according to his partner anyway
    · Share on Twitter
  • EssexphilEssexphil Member Posts: 8,874
    madprof said:

    Hey Phil....I wouldn't say @hanson was THAT inexperienced.......he doesn't normally delay, in fact I'm told he's even quicker normally...according to his partner anyway

    :)
    Not Will-he was pretty instantaneous-according to his partner....
    · Share on Twitter
  • MISTY4MEMISTY4ME Member Posts: 6,355
    Essexphil said:

    madprof said:

    Hey Phil....I wouldn't say @hanson was THAT inexperienced.......he doesn't normally delay, in fact I'm told he's even quicker normally...according to his partner anyway

    :)
    Not Will-he was pretty instantaneous-according to his partner....
    Premature Capitulation ? :D:D
    · Share on Twitter
  • EssexphilEssexphil Member Posts: 8,874
    MISTY4ME said:

    Essexphil said:

    madprof said:

    Hey Phil....I wouldn't say @hanson was THAT inexperienced.......he doesn't normally delay, in fact I'm told he's even quicker normally...according to his partner anyway

    :)
    Not Will-he was pretty instantaneous-according to his partner....
    Premature Capitulation ? :D:D
    Not sure-it's touch and go....
    · Share on Twitter
  • madprofmadprof Member Posts: 3,461
    Perhaps it could be Will's new employment? He could work a week in hand first
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.