You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Could i have played this better?

The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
edited March 2010 in Poker Chat
Title explains
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
Gaz90 Small blind  25.00 25.00 3635.00
Guy Big blind  50.00 75.00 980.00
  Your hole cards
  • A
  • K
     
MICKAA Call  50.00 125.00 2430.00
iveaces Call  50.00 175.00 1000.00
tiggy121 Fold     
The_Don90 Raise  150.00 325.00 3815.00
Gaz90 Fold     
Guy Call  100.00 425.00 880.00
MICKAA Call  100.00 525.00 2330.00
iveaces Call  100.00 625.00 900.00
Flop
   
  • Q
  • 5
  • 4
     
Guy Check     
MICKAA Check     
iveaces Check     
The_Don90 Bet  250.00 875.00 3565.00
Guy Call  250.00 1125.00 630.00
MICKAA Fold     
iveaces Fold     
Turn
   
  • 10
     
Guy All-in  630.00 1755.00 0.00
The_Don90 Call  630.00 2385.00 2935.00
Guy Show
  • 3
  • 4
   
The_Don90 Show
  • A
  • K
   
River
   
  • 7
     
Guy Win Pair of 4s 2385.00  2385.00
I have replaced my opponent who beat me with a differnt name og Guy

Comments

  • Ads2kukAds2kuk Member Posts: 582
    edited March 2010
    Hmmmm...

    I would of raised to 200 pre flop because I only want AK against 1 player really, especially against the limpers under the gun.

    When GUY checks and then just flat calls your bet it shows a sign of weakness for me, I think he would definately be re-raising with KQ/AQ/Set of something here..

    The push on the turn is a weird play by him but I think Im calling in your position there too...It came across to me that he wasn't strong and thats what it was. 

    Unlucky man.
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited March 2010
    when 'guy' goes allin,im assuming u probly know ur losing,but have flush draw and 2 over cards(assuming he hasnt got Q10),so you gotta call???,thats how i lose with AK 'often'...dont think id be callin with 34 tho,he mustv felt lukky.
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited March 2010
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better?:
    when 'guy' goes allin,im assuming u probly know ur losing,but have flush draw and 2 over cards(assuming he hasnt got Q10),so you gotta call???,thats how i lose with AK 'often'...dont think id be callin with 34 tho,he mustv felt lukky.
    Posted by philmenow
    I worked out i had these outs

    Any K - 3

    Any A - 3

    Any J (straight) - 4

    Any diamond - 9
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited March 2010

    i missed the str8 draw(lol),dont think u cudv played it any different,he was desperate,and when hed hit a little tiny bit he wasnt goin anywhere,and yes u had lots of outs,obviously if he had Q10 then ur K + A didnt really count.

  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited March 2010
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better?:
    i missed the str8 draw(lol),dont think u cudv played it any different,he was desperate,and when hed hit a little tiny bit he wasnt goin anywhere,and yes u had lots of outs,obviously if he had Q10 then ur K + A didnt really count.
    Posted by philmenow
    The reason he was so low was he was playing raggy Aces i was actually 100% confient he was betting a low ace
  • philmenowphilmenow Member Posts: 617
    edited March 2010
    certainly wouldnt put him on 34(lol),its such a shame these sort of plays 'win'.very speculative.but if all the chips had gone in pre flop thats the sort of muck u wanna be up against.
  • MereNoviceMereNovice Member Posts: 4,364
    edited March 2010
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better?:
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better? : I worked out i had these outs Any K - 3 Any A - 3 Any J (straight) - 4 Any diamond - 9
    Posted by The_Don90
    You've counted the Jd twice so you actually have one less out but you still easily have the pot odds to call his all-in.

    Looking at the action, it looks as though you are sat at a very loose/weak table of people who limp and call any bet. Therefore, you need to raise more pre-flop to get rid of them (or just limp pre-flop yourself and hope to hit and get paid with AdKd).
    On the flop you make a weak continuation bet but you still manage to get 2 of your 3 opponents to fold. It's risky to c-bet here against 3 opponents who you cannot put on a hand.

    The play by "guy" with 34 is speculative (at best) and you are unlucky to lose to him but you will obviously beat a player like that over time.

    In summary, on a table of loose players who call very light, play your big hands MUCH more aggressively.
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited March 2010
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better?:
    In Response to Re: Could i have played this better? : You've counted the Jd twice so you actually have one less out but you still easily have the pot odds to call his all-in. Looking at the action, it looks as though you are sat at a very loose/weak table of people who limp and call any bet. Therefore, you need to raise more pre-flop to get rid of them (or just limp pre-flop yourself and hope to hit and get paid with AdKd). On the flop you make a weak continuation bet but you still manage to get 2 of your 3 opponents to fold. It's risky to c-bet here against 3 opponents who you cannot put on a hand. The play by "guy" with 34 is speculative (at best) and you are unlucky to lose to him but you will obviously beat a player like that over time. In summary, on a table of loose players who call very light, play your big hands MUCH more aggressively.
    Posted by MereNovice
    Thanks MereNovice. As i stated somewhere i feel my play is now so much better but still room for alot of improvement.
Sign In or Register to comment.