Channeling a certain player that was discussed and vilified by Pokernews and other sources perhaps?
This may be controversial and will say anyway.
At least I can respect The Mouth as he seems to say exactly what's on his mind at the time. Of course it is completely misdirected and he followed up with an apology. Can't really defend that sort of behaviour. He looked a man under pressure....
With Danny Boy he played the Poker Public for years with his fake persona.
He appears, this is only personal opinion to have a bit of :-
Narcissistic traits and some Sociopathy. He is out for himself and likely has been that way for many years prior to the "more rake is better" debacle.
Not liked DNegs for years and on some 2+2 threads some of the guys there have advised what Daniel is like at a poker table.
He would be a nightmare at a table..... give me Kassouf any day
Gus is my poker hero Daniel is my least favourite poker hero Gabe Kaplan's commentary The show itself was great and comes a close 2nd to LNP circa turn of the century time It's a big hand and Daniel had his 'petted lip' out
Is Daniel playing on the GG Network, the one he is an Ambassador for?
If so......
Thought it was the WSOP network, looking again I am not certain.
If GG dump him I will maybe fling a few shillings at the games there.
This was the WSOP online only available to players in Nevada and New Jersey. WSOP events start on GG poker next weekend with the 100 dollar Opener. There is a 400 dollar Colossus and 500 dollar mini main that may appeal to some here. The issue re Daniel will be the association - I saw him being very rude in Barcelona so know he can lose it , only human.
I don't particularly like Daniel but I don't think this is that bad.
Software/computer issues are 10x more tilting than poker beats/issues and he's just angry at how bad the software is, not really slagging anyone individually with awful language. I probably like him more after seeing this
DNegs and I have a mutually beneficial coaching arrangement. I'm showing him how to rant properly during poker streams and, in return, he's showing me how to be an odious smug w*nker
I don't particularly like Daniel but I don't think this is that bad.
Software/computer issues are 10x more tilting than poker beats/issues and he's just angry at how bad the software is, not really slagging anyone individually with awful language. I probably like him more after seeing this
I think @mumsie used the word possible to imply that the inevitable wasn't in fact inevitable but merely possible, if he hadn't used the word possible then it would indeed have been inevitable and it is debatable as to whether or not something could be possibly inevitable as that would seem to be impossible.
That's what I think anyway, it is possible I am wrong although not inevitable.
Comments
People are considering GG poker as alternatives to Pokerstars should the inevitable happen.
This is so bad for their image.
This may be controversial and will say anyway.
At least I can respect The Mouth as he seems to say exactly what's on his mind at the time. Of course it is completely misdirected and he followed up with an apology. Can't really defend that sort of behaviour. He looked a man under pressure....
With Danny Boy he played the Poker Public for years with his fake persona.
He appears, this is only personal opinion to have a bit of :-
Narcissistic traits and some Sociopathy. He is out for himself and likely has been that way for many years prior to the "more rake is better" debacle.
Not liked DNegs for years and on some 2+2 threads some of the guys there have advised what Daniel is like at a poker table.
He would be a nightmare at a table..... give me Kassouf any day
Cammykaze
@mumsie
Morning Charlie,
What "inevitable" is that?
https://youtu.be/ousjeQ6YuDI
Reasons being:-
Gus is my poker hero
Daniel is my least favourite poker hero
Gabe Kaplan's commentary
The show itself was great and comes a close 2nd to LNP circa turn of the century time
It's a big hand and Daniel had his 'petted lip' out
Hi TK.
I scored badly in English grammar at school so am not a wordsmith.
I thought the "should" would soften the "inevitable".
@mumsie
Ahh yes, fair comment, that's my poor comprehension, not your writing.
My point being, of course, that the inevitable is not inevitable.
Gabe Kaplan was excellent on the high stakes cash games.
Is Daniel playing on the GG Network, the one he is an Ambassador for?
If so......
Thought it was the WSOP network, looking again I am not certain.
If GG dump him I will maybe fling a few shillings at the games there.
He does a @Duesenberg rant at 51:30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n6gN4bndx8&t=51m28s
ps if anyone is offended by swearing don't watch.
pps yea it's WSOP network not GG.
Software/computer issues are 10x more tilting than poker beats/issues and he's just angry at how bad the software is, not really slagging anyone individually with awful language. I probably like him more after seeing this
So i once again mis-read the whole saga.
Could someone please explain what is the possible inevitable that mumsie and Tikay are talking about.
Ta very much.
That's what I think anyway, it is possible I am wrong although not inevitable.