Sky Bet have just changed their Best Odds Guaranteed policy. It is now not applicable on extra place races or cash back races.
I had a '16/1' winner yesterday, and realised I only got 15/2 return on it as that was the price when I placed the bet.
In your honest view, is this good for the industry as a whole......better for the everyday punter......or somewhere in between?
I have not really made my mind up yet (ie. not clever enough to crunch the numbers), so will welcome your feedback.
0 ·
Comments
From an industry point opf view I guess BOG is worse because it's just great for everyone. Some people make mistakes with free bets using them on odds-on chances or forget to use them at all. On extra place races people sometimes are encouraged by races where it doesn't help much. If the loss leader involves startegy from the customer some people will use the wrong strategy.
There are often better deals on the same race with different bookies.
Especially if the odds are fluctuating.
If I fancy a horse, I have 3 betting accounts open at the same time.
Sky have a nasty habit of changing the odds as you try to bet and mostly to a worse price.I
It's half the fun grabbing the best deal
Oddschecker.com (which is part of the FLUTTER Group I think) is also a great tool for checking the odds
I'm usually happier to have the extra places because of the amount of times my bets have sneaked into that extra place or places
last year it was a maximum bet of £20 on the first race each day at Cheltenham.
I made a killing with the 'no risk betting. £20 each day bet on that race, 2 winners, I netted £180
This year maximum bet £10, 1 winner 1 loss £15 up but today that offer is unavailable.
instead it's 2nd 3rd or 4th????
I'm sure they were advertising the offer for each day (or was it clever word play)
However, grateful for the free bets on the first 2 days.