To some extent , that is true. But it is more than that.
There are some things Trump did which I detested because of my politics. His belief in relation to MAGA (great slogan, by the way). His racism. His sexism. His appalling attitude towards the poor. That's mostly standard stuff.
But-it goes beyond that. He is a 75-year-old man who behaves like a 5-year-old. His appalling disloyalty to his political supporters. His unshakeable belief that if something went right it was because of Donald Trump. And if it went wrong, to fire blame and ridicule the person who was loyal to him. On a scale never seen before. A deeply disloyal man.
For not seeing the irony that, having luckily won a close election in 2016 with 3 million less votes, **** and whining like the child he is when he lost the 2020 election by 7 million votes. For lacking any sort of humility in defeat.
There have been many great right-wing Presidents. Done things I might not personally agree with, but done them well. Trump? History will make even Biden look good in comparison.
How about the sheep that want to go for as many jabs as are recommended, all ages, without looking at any facts out there. Jeez.
I have certainly taken all the jabs I've been offered so far. How can you possibly know whether I first checked the facts?
Facts that stated there was always a 99.8% chance of recovery. That there has always been treatment, although that seems to get overlooked as a conspiracy. That was put up last May 2020, but was silenced. 6 months before the first vaccine. The fact that the WHO were saying every single person on earth needs a shot, months before a vaccine was allowed for use. With the recovery rate constantly published,never changing.Children not hospitalised or even ill. Changing the definition of a pandemic to suit. Folks not dropping dead in the street as was seen in China.
I’m referring to the whole population in general, you will have your own facts to influence your decision. I never singled out any particular individual.
Facts/ stats are there to be viewed by all, but none lead to the whole world needing jab after jab.
If you believe that to be untrue,then show me the evidence.
99.8% chance of recovery you say.
Is that a blanket figure across all ages or does a 20 year old have a much better chance of recovery than an 80 year old, for example?
Relative peace in the Middle East (multiple Arab countries signing peace deals with Israel). Reigned in N Korea. Stood up to China. No new wars, reduction in existing ones. The First Step Act. Clamp down on trafficking (human and drugs) on the Southern Border.
How about the sheep that want to go for as many jabs as are recommended, all ages, without looking at any facts out there. Jeez.
I have certainly taken all the jabs I've been offered so far. How can you possibly know whether I first checked the facts?
Facts that stated there was always a 99.8% chance of recovery. That there has always been treatment, although that seems to get overlooked as a conspiracy. That was put up last May 2020, but was silenced. 6 months before the first vaccine. The fact that the WHO were saying every single person on earth needs a shot, months before a vaccine was allowed for use. With the recovery rate constantly published,never changing.Children not hospitalised or even ill. Changing the definition of a pandemic to suit. Folks not dropping dead in the street as was seen in China.
I’m referring to the whole population in general, you will have your own facts to influence your decision. I never singled out any particular individual.
Facts/ stats are there to be viewed by all, but none lead to the whole world needing jab after jab.
If you believe that to be untrue,then show me the evidence.
99.8% chance of recovery you say.
Is that a blanket figure across all ages or does a 20 year old have a much better chance of recovery than an 80 year old, for example?
All the fact checkers are paid up members, which is proven time after time when their fact checking gets proven to be incorrect. It must be difficult for them though,as the guiding lights keep changing their tosh.
Don’t forget Chris Whitty says most people would only get mild disease if they caught it at all. He also added that even most elderly wouldn’t die from catching it. Presenting your the expert.
Maybe somebody might be able to answer this question,as hhyf always goes silent.
Tony most likely informed himself or was advised before receiving his shots. Unfortunately, Tony won’t be representative for 7billion. As VespaPX has highlighted, the reasons for folks taking an experimental jab are **** s poor.
Holidays? Because the government ask me to?I want to be allowed to go here or there? I’ve a mate that said it keeps her indoors happy.
Question time. It’s quite apparent from the off that folks weren’t well informed . Just line up with the others when called.
So, informed consent. I very much doubt folks going for the first experimental jab were informed of all the possible side effects. Even if they were, more side effects were added,one after the other, this was after millions had received their first shot. So is it a rolling informed consent? Trust the science, no need for Vaers.
So the survival rates for both an 80 year old and a 20 year old are 99.8%, yes?
50/50
It's true tbf.
If you get Covid, you live or you die. Doesn't get more 50/50 than that.
The Chilling logic in action.
You need to keep your fingers crossed, after what I’ve found out this morning.
You cant understand anything. Like if you put a win bet on. You either win or lose.50-50. Right or wrong. The odds are for the layer.
I bet your workings will indicate a 3-1 shot will always finish in front of a 10-1 shot. It doesn’t matter if there’s two runners or twenty two runners for the sake of a bet.
So the survival rates for both an 80 year old and a 20 year old are 99.8%, yes?
50/50
It's true tbf.
If you get Covid, you live or you die. Doesn't get more 50/50 than that.
The Chilling logic in action.
You need to keep your fingers crossed, after what I’ve found out this morning.
You cant understand anything. Like if you put a win bet on. You either win or lose.50-50. Right or wrong. The odds are for the layer.
I bet your workings will indicate a 3-1 shot will always finish in front of a 10-1 shot. It doesn’t matter if there’s two runners or twenty two runners for the sake of a bet.
So the survival rates for both an 80 year old and a 20 year old are 99.8%, yes?
50/50
It's true tbf.
If you get Covid, you live or you die. Doesn't get more 50/50 than that.
The Chilling logic in action.
You need to keep your fingers crossed, after what I’ve found out this morning.
You cant understand anything. Like if you put a win bet on. You either win or lose.50-50. Right or wrong. The odds are for the layer.
I bet your workings will indicate a 3-1 shot will always finish in front of a 10-1 shot. It doesn’t matter if there’s two runners or twenty two runners for the sake of a bet.
Can anyone dissect this gibberish?
The top line is regarding the shots, if that helps.
Comments
There are some things Trump did which I detested because of my politics. His belief in relation to MAGA (great slogan, by the way). His racism. His sexism. His appalling attitude towards the poor. That's mostly standard stuff.
But-it goes beyond that. He is a 75-year-old man who behaves like a 5-year-old. His appalling disloyalty to his political supporters. His unshakeable belief that if something went right it was because of Donald Trump. And if it went wrong, to fire blame and ridicule the person who was loyal to him. On a scale never seen before. A deeply disloyal man.
For not seeing the irony that, having luckily won a close election in 2016 with 3 million less votes, **** and whining like the child he is when he lost the 2020 election by 7 million votes. For lacking any sort of humility in defeat.
There have been many great right-wing Presidents. Done things I might not personally agree with, but done them well. Trump? History will make even Biden look good in comparison.
Is that a blanket figure across all ages or does a 20 year old have a much better chance of recovery than an 80 year old, for example?
https://fullfact.org/online/covid-19-survival-rate-less-998/
Can't find anything without mentioning Trump.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/energy-independence-trump/
Relative peace in the Middle East (multiple Arab countries signing peace deals with Israel).
Reigned in N Korea.
Stood up to China.
No new wars, reduction in existing ones.
The First Step Act.
Clamp down on trafficking (human and drugs) on the Southern Border.
Some others:
https://www.worldhistoryedu.com/donald-trump-achievement/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/9-11-memorial-truther-nypd-b1918651.html?utm_content=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR04w_rQJuQy9ZI3OmWzyV2Mgqepp5SGBfzAeV0qc5cNkg7cDE9Mi579sao#Echobox=1631458405
All the fact checkers are paid up members, which is proven time after time when their fact checking gets proven to be incorrect.
It must be difficult for them though,as the guiding lights keep changing their tosh.
Don’t forget Chris Whitty says most people would only get mild disease if they caught it at all.
He also added that even most elderly wouldn’t die from catching it. Presenting your the expert.
Maybe somebody might be able to answer this question,as hhyf always goes silent.
Tony most likely informed himself or was advised before receiving his shots.
Unfortunately, Tony won’t be representative for 7billion.
As VespaPX has highlighted, the reasons for folks taking an experimental jab are **** s poor.
Holidays? Because the government ask me to?I want to be allowed to go here or there?
I’ve a mate that said it keeps her indoors happy.
Question time.
It’s quite apparent from the off that folks weren’t well informed .
Just line up with the others when called.
So, informed consent.
I very much doubt folks going for the first experimental jab were informed of all the possible side effects. Even if they were, more side effects were added,one after the other, this was after millions had received their first shot.
So is it a rolling informed consent?
Trust the science, no need for Vaers.
99.8% chance of recovery you say.
Is that a blanket figure across all ages or does a 20 year old have a much better chance of recovery than an 80 year old, for example?
https://fullfact.org/online/covid-19-survival-rate-less-998/
I’d say this was a fairly accurate summing up.
If you get Covid, you live or you die. Doesn't get more 50/50 than that.
The Chilling logic in action.
The killer has been the protocol.
You cant understand anything.
Like if you put a win bet on. You either win or lose.50-50. Right or wrong.
The odds are for the layer.
I bet your workings will indicate a 3-1 shot will always finish in front of a 10-1 shot.
It doesn’t matter if there’s two runners or twenty two runners for the sake of a bet.
By the amount of runners?
You either win it or you don't.