I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I think the reason that these articles are written is to highlight the difficulties in our taking back control. The numbers in this article are indeed small. Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently. The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
Judge Stops Northern Ireland Deportations, Throwing UK Immigration Into Disarray
Essexphil said: I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I think the reason that these articles are written is to highlight the difficulties in our taking back control. The numbers in this article are indeed small. Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently. The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
Or perhaps they will start stopping anyone that looks like they could be an asylum seeker. Which could have very unfortunate consequences.
I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I think the reason that these articles are written is to highlight the difficulties in our taking back control. The numbers in this article are indeed small. Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently. The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
Or perhaps they will start stopping anyone that looks like they could be an asylum seeker. Which could have very unfortunate consequences.
You would think if the flights ever took off to Rwanda, that these numbers would increase. What do you think the response might be in Ireland/NI?
All a bit vague really. It's all seeking to do this and exploring that, which means no viable plan.
If real dialogue is actually reached then you can be sure that it's because the EU want something we have.
You can only reset a relationship if both all parties are happy to.
The noises coming from the EU have all been about how they are thriving and growing without the UK, so why would they even want to reset any relationship.
All a bit vague really. It's all seeking to do this and exploring that, which means no viable plan.
If real dialogue is actually reached then you can be sure that it's because the EU want something we have.
You can only reset a relationship if both all parties are happy to.
The noises coming from the EU have all been about how they are thriving and growing without the UK, so why would they even want to reset any relationship.
Just asking for a friend.
It was a bit vague. Starmer has already talked about resetting the relationship a number of times, Without going into any detail. We gain nothing by being at loggerheads with them. Much better to be friends. Alignment rather than divergence will cause less problems for the future. Starmer was a big remainer, as was Scotland. Although they are saying that there are no plans to return.
Comments
But you cant have a referendum have the vote go leave and then dissrespect that and rejoin without another vote.
If any politician wants to take us back in we need the vote again.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/realities-of-post-brexit-life-how-it-s-still-changing-the-uk-daily/ss-BB1n2gcM?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=d9e46a506dbf4c1bbae62faa94f82586&ei=59
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/50-people-caught-trying-enter-135358414.html
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
The numbers in this article are indeed small.
Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently.
The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/judge-stops-northern-ireland-deportations-throwing-uk-immigration-into-disarray/ss-BB1n8cqL?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=a803fc5bc7634bee98c5ba3911dbb03a&ei=10
I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I think the reason that these articles are written is to highlight the difficulties in our taking back control.
The numbers in this article are indeed small.
Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently.
The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
Or perhaps they will start stopping anyone that looks like they could be an asylum seeker.
Which could have very unfortunate consequences.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/5-billion-brexit-bill-leaves-uk-without-border-control/ss-BB1nbX0S?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=fbd49242e4034e4b8d765b7ffb302c5b&ei=50
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newslondon/labour-would-reset-relationship-with-european-union-says-sarwar/ar-BB1nbVaR?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=782170c057a74355b1f544f9a2939743&ei=42#fullscreen
I find this particular story fascinating. By which I mean the whole migrant GB to NI to Ireland thing.
It is really a rather small story. Being bigged up by the UK Govt, the Irish Govt, Brexiteers and Remainers. As some sort of massive p1ssing contest.
This is peak season for the "illegal" migrants.
How many people have travelled to GB over those 4 days? 2,000? 4,000? Something like that. Certainly in the low thousands.
The very idea that migrants travel from France to GB, to then travel to NI, to then bounce on to Ireland en masse always sounded rather far-fetched. I'm sure there have always been a few. Equally sure there have not been many.
We get this big story about Rwanda. And we are sold this vision of hordes of migrants bouncing from country to country desperately trying to avoid going to Rwanda.
And it is just not true. Which is why 50 in 4 days, while the Irish Govt is trying to prove a point, is a rather low number.
I think the reason that these articles are written is to highlight the difficulties in our taking back control.
The numbers in this article are indeed small.
Although there have apparently been some bigger numbers recently.
The interest I suppose is in whether the Irish will end up unofficially policing the NI border, whether Brits will end up having to produce a passport when travelling within the UK, or both.
Or perhaps they will start stopping anyone that looks like they could be an asylum seeker.
Which could have very unfortunate consequences.
You would think if the flights ever took off to Rwanda, that these numbers would increase.
What do you think the response might be in Ireland/NI?
If real dialogue is actually reached then you can be sure that it's because the EU want something we have.
You can only reset a relationship if both all parties are happy to.
The noises coming from the EU have all been about how they are thriving and growing without the UK, so why would they even want to reset any relationship.
Just asking for a friend.
Starmer has already talked about resetting the relationship a number of times,
Without going into any detail.
We gain nothing by being at loggerheads with them.
Much better to be friends.
Alignment rather than divergence will cause less problems for the future.
Starmer was a big remainer, as was Scotland.
Although they are saying that there are no plans to return.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/keir-starmer-s-eu-dream-shattered-as-brussels-slaps-down-brexit-reset-plans/ar-BB1neStW?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=5d9d9336f9ba4e76a00b9d8892441ae0&ei=86#fullscreen
It had to be The Express.
I only read the first paragraph.
In which the EU slap down seems to merely relate to a comment made by one diplomat.
Although my first paragraph was "It had to be the Express".
No need to go any further
A bit like changing your shirt when you've just shat your trousers.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/robinson-to-continue-irish-sea-border-fight-after-being-ratified-as-dup-leader/ar-BB1nhpyW?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=3f649eb6465e48989bc0b391fea7929b&ei=118#fullscreen
In other shock news, Sinn Fein have a leader who wants to be closer to Ireland. And further from the UK
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/labour-just-let-slip-true-110617779.html