Freeroll points.

SCOTFOX

Bonus points in the cheap 28p & 55p games should award TWO points to the winners and NONE to the losers.

If SKY awarded points only to the 3 winners then people like me would stop going 'All-in' with Ace Rag, KQ etc
.
TBH i am not interested in winning 50p, i just want enough points to play the free rolls to qualify for bigger tournaments and win decent money for a small outlay.

Any thoughts?

mumsie

I think 1 point is generous when it could be 0.25 and 0.50 of a point.

johnmonty

So people losing all the time would get no prize money and no rewards why would they keep playing?

SCOTFOX

johnmonty said:

So people losing all the time would get no prize money and no rewards why would they keep playing?

If points were only awarded for winning then people would have to play properly to gain them.
It would make the game fairer for the people who are trying to play 'proper poker'
ATM i just just chuck my chips in with anything half decent and i do not care if i win or lose my 28p.

Doubleme

SCOTFOX said:

johnmonty said:

So people losing all the time would get no prize money and no rewards why would they keep playing?

If points were only awarded for winning then people would have to play properly to gain them.
It would make the game fairer for the people who are trying to play 'proper poker'
ATM i just just chuck my chips in with anything half decent and i do not care if i win or lose my 28p.

I would much rather my opponents are playing bad/not playing proper poker when i am trying to play proper poker. certain spots this may not be the case eg calling station when down to four players in a don sitting directly behind me.

However having these players in my games would be more in my interest long term then a load of players who play "proper poker" as you put it.

I do not currently play 28p dons but if I did I would much rather villains play badly then proper as an aggregate whole.