"Arena Bomb did not happen" Conspiracy Theorist loses harassment case

Tikay10

What IS the matter with these conspiracy theorists? Imagine saying that the Manchester Arena bomb never happened....

Arena bomb survivors win conspiracy harassment case

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj0j8r8558yo

stokefc

How can a person deny the fact that such a tragic event never happened, it's bewildering and very annoying anyway the eejit got his comeuppance

stokefc

Another thing, how can social media give these idiots a platform to voice their idiotic vitriol

tai-gar

stokefc said:

Another thing, how can social media give these idiots a platform to voice their idiotic vitriol

The only good thing is that you don’t have to “spot the loonies” any more they are in plain sight.

Tikay10

stokefc said:

How can a person deny the fact that such a tragic event never happened, it's bewildering and very annoying anyway the eejit got his comeuppance

Disgraceful, isn't it? They have no shame.

And now we have Trump with his "the Haitians are eating our cats & dogs" defending his position, because he states "I read about it, so it must be true".

God help us all if he gets in. Just imagine it, President of the United States is a conspiracy theorist.

mumsie

Heres a link to the court papers.

Gives you an insight into what these bat sh1t crazy conspiracy theorists believe.

This is the sort of stuff our resident conspiracy theorist watches and believes, then it gets banned on YouTube it must be true.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hibbert-v-Hall-Judgment.pdf


Some extracts from the paper which is tldr.

....that the Manchester Arena attack was an elaborate hoax -
carefully planned by elements within the state and involving ordinary citizens (including
the claimants) in the deception as “crisis actors” - in which no one was injured or died.

Mr Hall explains that the “pre-vacated victim” is somebody who used to live in a
particular place but has died or emigrated and their identity has been used “to say they
died”.

The “greedy parents and apprentice daughter victim” refers to a family with a
daughter approaching school leaving age and “aspiring in some field”.

Mr Hall hypothesises that the “daughter has been sent to some prestigious place to be educated,perhaps in another country, and the parents are being given half a million pounds to keep their mouths shut.

They’re possibly still in touch on Skype”.

In the third category,

“the child who they’ve claimed has died has gone to another family”.

The “no ties victim” is, according to Mr Hall, “a young adult who’s never been married and got no children, and who was quite happy to have their identity changed to go and live in another country for half a million quid”.

Mr Hall’s final category consists of a “couple of people” who“didn’t really have a connection with the concert” who may have been “bumped off in
this incident… But not with the bomb”.

Tikay10

mumsie said:

Heres a link to the court papers.

Gives you an insight into what these bat sh1t crazy conspiracy theorists believe.

This is the sort of stuff our resident conspiracy theorist watches and believes, then it gets banned on YouTube it must be true.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hibbert-v-Hall-Judgment.pdf


Some extracts from the paper which is tldr.

....that the Manchester Arena attack was an elaborate hoax -
carefully planned by elements within the state and involving ordinary citizens (including
the claimants) in the deception as “crisis actors” - in which no one was injured or died.

Mr Hall explains that the “pre-vacated victim” is somebody who used to live in a
particular place but has died or emigrated and their identity has been used “to say they
died”.

The “greedy parents and apprentice daughter victim” refers to a family with a
daughter approaching school leaving age and “aspiring in some field”.

Mr Hall hypothesises that the “daughter has been sent to some prestigious place to be educated,perhaps in another country, and the parents are being given half a million pounds to keep their mouths shut.

They’re possibly still in touch on Skype”.

In the third category,

“the child who they’ve claimed has died has gone to another family”.

The “no ties victim” is, according to Mr Hall, “a young adult who’s never been married and got no children, and who was quite happy to have their identity changed to go and live in another country for half a million quid”.

Mr Hall’s final category consists of a “couple of people” who“didn’t really have a connection with the concert” who may have been “bumped off in
this incident… But not with the bomb”.

@mumsie


For crying out loud, how insensitive are these nutjob conspiracy theorists, & how stupid do they think we are?

rabdeniro

Ah know what ah would do if any of ma relatives were involved in this tragedy, and after it ah would say to him that didn't happen did it.

Tikay10

rabdeniro said:

Ah know what ah would do if any of ma relatives were involved in this tragedy, and after it ah would say to him that didn't happen did it.

@rabdeniro


Ha, excellent.

Essexphil

rabdeniro said:

Ah know what ah would do if any of ma relatives were involved in this tragedy, and after it ah would say to him that didn't happen did it.

Too easy. Tempting. But too quick.

I'd sue them. Take all their assets away. Bankrupt them. And publicly ridicule, hound and humiliate them.

Which is exactly what happens

rabdeniro

Essexphil said:

rabdeniro said:

Ah know what ah would do if any of ma relatives were involved in this tragedy, and after it ah would say to him that didn't happen did it.

Too easy. Tempting. But too quick.

I'd sue them. Take all their assets away. Bankrupt them. And publicly ridicule, hound and humiliate them.

Which is exactly what happens

Aye once a lawyer always a lawyer .

Doubleme

Conspiracy theorists can be very entertaining, Like David Icke is either someone suffering from mental illness or a con man. So either way I could not in good conscience support that. However if he was just a this is just entertainment story teller entertainer etc and everything been the same I could completely buy tickets to go and see him.

Alex Jones was very entertaining I mean I think almost all of his audience realized he was a whack job but found it very entertaining. And It was good and just a laugh when it was "There turning the frogs gay" or reptillian world order. However when they went on about the sandy hook absolutely unacceptable cant have that. Now you have another one in similiar vian.

Just we need a good actor, to portray the crazy conspiracyst without I dunno victim blaming terrorist victims by alleging there actors on some conspiracy.

I mean is that so much to ask maybe we Need that Borat/ Ali G guy back he could do this well and it would be a relavant charecter of today.

HAYSIE

Tikay10 said:

mumsie said:

Heres a link to the court papers.

Gives you an insight into what these bat sh1t crazy conspiracy theorists believe.

This is the sort of stuff our resident conspiracy theorist watches and believes, then it gets banned on YouTube it must be true.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hibbert-v-Hall-Judgment.pdf


Some extracts from the paper which is tldr.

....that the Manchester Arena attack was an elaborate hoax -
carefully planned by elements within the state and involving ordinary citizens (including
the claimants) in the deception as “crisis actors” - in which no one was injured or died.

Mr Hall explains that the “pre-vacated victim” is somebody who used to live in a
particular place but has died or emigrated and their identity has been used “to say they
died”.

The “greedy parents and apprentice daughter victim” refers to a family with a
daughter approaching school leaving age and “aspiring in some field”.

Mr Hall hypothesises that the “daughter has been sent to some prestigious place to be educated,perhaps in another country, and the parents are being given half a million pounds to keep their mouths shut.

They’re possibly still in touch on Skype”.

In the third category,

“the child who they’ve claimed has died has gone to another family”.

The “no ties victim” is, according to Mr Hall, “a young adult who’s never been married and got no children, and who was quite happy to have their identity changed to go and live in another country for half a million quid”.

Mr Hall’s final category consists of a “couple of people” who“didn’t really have a connection with the concert” who may have been “bumped off in
this incident… But not with the bomb”.

@mumsie


For crying out loud, how insensitive are these nutjob conspiracy theorists, & how stupid do they think we are?

Isnt that pretty much what Alex Jones said about the Sandy Hook shootings?

HAYSIE

HAYSIE said:

Tikay10 said:

mumsie said:

Heres a link to the court papers.

Gives you an insight into what these bat sh1t crazy conspiracy theorists believe.

This is the sort of stuff our resident conspiracy theorist watches and believes, then it gets banned on YouTube it must be true.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hibbert-v-Hall-Judgment.pdf


Some extracts from the paper which is tldr.

....that the Manchester Arena attack was an elaborate hoax -
carefully planned by elements within the state and involving ordinary citizens (including
the claimants) in the deception as “crisis actors” - in which no one was injured or died.

Mr Hall explains that the “pre-vacated victim” is somebody who used to live in a
particular place but has died or emigrated and their identity has been used “to say they
died”.

The “greedy parents and apprentice daughter victim” refers to a family with a
daughter approaching school leaving age and “aspiring in some field”.

Mr Hall hypothesises that the “daughter has been sent to some prestigious place to be educated,perhaps in another country, and the parents are being given half a million pounds to keep their mouths shut.

They’re possibly still in touch on Skype”.

In the third category,

“the child who they’ve claimed has died has gone to another family”.

The “no ties victim” is, according to Mr Hall, “a young adult who’s never been married and got no children, and who was quite happy to have their identity changed to go and live in another country for half a million quid”.

Mr Hall’s final category consists of a “couple of people” who“didn’t really have a connection with the concert” who may have been “bumped off in
this incident… But not with the bomb”.

@mumsie


For crying out loud, how insensitive are these nutjob conspiracy theorists, & how stupid do they think we are?

Isnt that pretty much what Alex Jones said about the Sandy Hook shootings?

Jones, who founded the conspiracy-laden Infowars website and talk show, argued for years that the massacre was a "staged" government plot to take guns from Americans and that "no-one died". He called the parents of victims "crisis actors" and argued that some of them never actually existed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092#:~:text=Jones, who founded the conspiracy-laden Infowars website and,argued that some of them never actually existed.