Absolutely not, & I can't think of any single reason why it should. It's a luxury, nobody has the right to luxuries.
If we are talking about fundamental rights, I'd be more concerned about the fundamental rights of civilians in Gaza, Darfur & so many other war-torn places where they have no running water, sanitation, health care, shelter or food. Access to the internet will be the last thing on their minds right now imo.
I do think certain groups of people should get free internet, low income pensioners for one. When you phone NHS, DWP, Utility companies and the likes you are kept waiting for ages then you get a automated message telling to go on their website, also some of these companies do not answer the phone so you have no choice but to use a website. A lot of people can't afford heating and food nevermind the internet.
What Tony said is right. When there are so many definitively fundamental rights still being taken from beings all over the planet you cannot even debate adding things like computers and phones, let alone internet.
Who wants a 10 year old child with unfettered access to por nography?
There is a desperate need for the Internet to operate totally differently for children
Ah would think most families with young kids have the internet, it's up to the parents to monitor the kids.
I would agree that parental responsibility seems to be a thing of the past in so many cases. Although I would say that this has become much more difficult since the internet became accessible from a mobile phone, and youngsters have become more aware, and cleverer than their parents when it comes to their settings.
With Governments and businessess/banks etc. moving their services online then it will eventually have to be a right.
To whoever disagreed, could you please explain how you would survive when everything goes digital, which it will do eventually?
Never gonna happen
I hope it doesn't but it will.
It won't need to be a right as it will be compulsory to enable them to usher in their "social credit score, track and trace systems, etc.
To many people in the world with no access so therefore it cannot happen in theory - Same as a cashless society - We can also never allow either to happen
It all depends how you're defining fundamental human right and where you are in the world. Take China for instance. Who are we to tell them that their method is incorrect?
Subsidizing internet access in some way, yes, but to call internet access a fundamental human right? I'm not sure about that yet.
Comments
Absolutely not, & I can't think of any single reason why it should. It's a luxury, nobody has the right to luxuries.
If we are talking about fundamental rights, I'd be more concerned about the fundamental rights of civilians in Gaza, Darfur & so many other war-torn places where they have no running water, sanitation, health care, shelter or food. Access to the internet will be the last thing on their minds right now imo.
Good question - as always - by the way @Williams12
And the question does bring into focus what an entitled society we have become.
When you phone NHS, DWP, Utility companies and the likes you are kept waiting for ages then you get a automated message telling to go on their website, also some of these companies do not answer the phone so you have no choice but to use a website.
A lot of people can't afford heating and food nevermind the internet.
Who wants a 10 year old child with unfettered access to por nography?
There is a desperate need for the Internet to operate totally differently for children
Although I would say that this has become much more difficult since the internet became accessible from a mobile phone, and youngsters have become more aware, and cleverer than their parents when it comes to their settings.
It won't need to be a right as it will be compulsory to enable them to usher in their "social credit score, track and trace systems, etc.
Subsidizing internet access in some way, yes, but to call internet access a fundamental human right? I'm not sure about that yet.